Investigation of bias due to loss of participants in a Dutch multicentre prospective spinal cord injury cohort study
OBJECTIVE: To determine bias due to loss of participants (attrition bias) in a prospective cohort study. DESIGN: A multi-centre prospective cohort study. SUBJECTS: A total of 225 individuals with a spinal cord injury from 8 Dutch rehabilitation centres. METHODS: Participants were considered non-participants when no information was collected at the measurement one year after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Using bivariate tests participants and non-participants were compared regarding personal, lesion, function and functional characteristics determined at the beginning of inpatient reh... Mehr ...
Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Dokumenttyp: | Artikel |
Erscheinungsdatum: | 2009 |
Reihe/Periodikum: | de Groot , S , Haisma , J A , Post , M W M , van Asbeck , F W A & van der Woude , L H V 2009 , ' Investigation of bias due to loss of participants in a Dutch multicentre prospective spinal cord injury cohort study ' , Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine , vol. 41 , no. 5 , pp. 382-9 . https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0346 |
Schlagwörter: | Activities of Daily Living / Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Bias (Epidemiology) / Cohort Studies / Female / Follow-Up Studies / Humans / Longitudinal Studies / Male / Middle Aged / Outcome Assessment (Health Care) / Patient Dropouts / Patient Participation / Prospective Studies / Spinal Cord Injuries / Young Adult |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Permalink: | https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29028291 |
Datenquelle: | BASE; Originalkatalog |
Powered By: | BASE |
Link(s) : | https://hdl.handle.net/11370/8e67285a-41bd-40b6-8d95-c575b294440c |
OBJECTIVE: To determine bias due to loss of participants (attrition bias) in a prospective cohort study. DESIGN: A multi-centre prospective cohort study. SUBJECTS: A total of 225 individuals with a spinal cord injury from 8 Dutch rehabilitation centres. METHODS: Participants were considered non-participants when no information was collected at the measurement one year after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Using bivariate tests participants and non-participants were compared regarding personal, lesion, function and functional characteristics determined at the beginning of inpatient rehabilitation and at discharge. A logistic regression was performed to determine which characteristics predict participation at one year after discharge. RESULTS: Of the participants at the start of the study, 31% (n = 69) did not perform the tests one year after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Variables associated with study participation one year after discharge were: higher level of education, higher well-being score at the start of rehabilitation, and a shorter length of stay in hospital and rehabilitation centre at discharge of inpatient rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: Selective attrition in the longitudinal study might have led to an over-estimation of some of the results of the measurement one year after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation.