Performance of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for diagnosis of pulmonary and extra-pulmonary tuberculosis, one year of use in a multi-centric hospital laboratory in Brussels, Belgium

Among the challenges in controlling tuberculosis, a rapid and accurate diagnostic test for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex ( MTB c) and its resistance to first line therapies is crucial. We evaluated the performance of the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay (Xpert Ultra) for the rapid detection of MTB c and rifampicin resistance (RR) in 1120 pulmonary and 461 extra-pulmonary clinical specimens and compared it with conventional phenotypic techniques. The Xpert Ultra assay detected MTB c in 223 (14.1%) samples with an overall sensitivity and specificity, using culture as the “gold sta... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Mekkaoui, Leila
Hallin, Marie
Mouchet, Françoise
Payen, Marie-Christine
Maillart, Evelyne
Clevenbergh, Philippe
Georgala, Aspasia
Van den Wijngaert, Sigi
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2021
Reihe/Periodikum: PLOS ONE ; volume 16, issue 4, page e0249734 ; ISSN 1932-6203
Verlag/Hrsg.: Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-28547503
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249734

Among the challenges in controlling tuberculosis, a rapid and accurate diagnostic test for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex ( MTB c) and its resistance to first line therapies is crucial. We evaluated the performance of the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay (Xpert Ultra) for the rapid detection of MTB c and rifampicin resistance (RR) in 1120 pulmonary and 461 extra-pulmonary clinical specimens and compared it with conventional phenotypic techniques. The Xpert Ultra assay detected MTB c in 223 (14.1%) samples with an overall sensitivity and specificity, using culture as the “gold standard”, of 91.1% (95% CI, 85.6–95.1) and 94.5% (95% CI, 93.1–95.6), respectively. The sensitivity of the Xpert Ultra test for smear-negative extra-pulmonary specimens was high (87.1%), even higher than with smear-negative pulmonary specimens (81.8%). But this enhanced sensitivity came with a low overall specificity of smear-negative extra-pulmonary specimens (66.7%). For 73 patients, 79/1423 (3.4%) negative mycobacterial culture samples were found to be positive with Xpert Ultra. Clinical data was necessary to correctly interpret potential false-positive results, especially trace-positive results. Sensitivity of the Xpert Ultra to detect RR compared to drug susceptibility testing was 100% (95% CI, 29.2–100) and specificity was 99.2% (95% CI, 95.8–100). We concluded that the Xpert Ultra test is able to provide a reliable TB diagnosis within a significantly shorter turnaround time than culture. This is especially true for paucibacillary samples such as smear-negative pulmonary specimens and extra-pulmonary specimens.