Additional file 3 of Genomic diversity and signatures of selection in meat and fancy rabbit breeds based on high-density marker data

Verfasser:	Mohamad Ballan (11987612) Samuele Bovo (4182802) Giuseppina Schiavo (766650) Michele Schiavitto (11987615) Riccardo Negrini (234230) Luca Fontanesi (9035177)
Dokumenttyp:	Dataset
Erscheinungsdatum:	2022
Schlagwörter:	Genetics / phenotypic variation among / main phenotypic differences / add novel information / affect coat colour / broad phenotypic diversity / latter comparing breeds / includes many breeds / fancy rabbit breeders / fancy breeds ) / different coat colours / analyzed rabbit breeds / rabbit external traits / coat colours / analyzed breeds / external traits / genomic diversity / different approaches / col2a1 ) / related traits / morphometric traits / ’ argent / wide view / strong candidate / selective sweeps / purpose species / might contribute / liph ) / italian white / italian spotted / italian silver / including single / including genes / included genes / identified based / identification proves / grouped based / giant white / giant grey / genetic loci / fur structure / fixation index / dwarf lop / domestication process / coloured dwarf / checkered giant / burgundy fawn / body sizes / body size / belgian hare
Sprache:	unknown
Permalink:	https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-28488639
Datenquelle:	BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By:	BASE
Link(s) :	https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.18864764.v1

Additional file 3: Table S7. List of outlier markers identified using PCAdapt. Table S11. Comparative single-breed FST analysis (M1 = Method 1). The genome windows at the extreme lower end of the distributions (99.0th percentile) are presented. Table S12. Comparative single-breed FST analysis (M2 = Method 2). The genome windows at the extreme lower end of the distributions (99.0th percentile) are presented. Table S13. Genome regions identified in the single-breed FST analyses (99.8th percentile). Table S15. List of the markers at the extreme lower end of the distributions (99.95th percentile) identified with the FST single-marker-based analysis for the single-breed approach using Method 1 (M1). SNPs are reported in decreasing order of FST value. Table S16. List of the markers at the extreme lower end of the distributions (99.95th percentile) identified with the FST single-marker-based analysis for the single-breed approach using Method 2 (M2). SNPs are reported in decreasing order of FST value. Table S19. Comparative FST analysis for groups of breeds as defined in Additional file 1: Table S2. The genome windows at the extreme lower end of the distributions (99.0th percentile) are presented. Table S21. List of the markers at the extreme lower end of the distributions (99.95th percentile) identified with the FST single-marker-based analysis using the approach that includes groups of breeds. SNPs are reported in decreasing order of FST value. SNPs are reported in decreasing order of FST value. Table S22. Genotype information for SNPs within the KIT gene region. Table S23. Observed heterozygosity of SNPs within the KIT gene region. Table S24. Genotype information for SNPs within the HMGA2 gene region. Table S25. Observed heterozygosity of SNPs within the HMGA2 gene region.