Development of Dutch children’s comprehension of subject and object wh -questions ; The role of topicality

While Dutch welke ‘which’-questions are structurally ambiguous, number agreement cues can disambiguate them. Despite such agreement cues, children misinterpret object questions as subject questions (Metz et al. 2010, 2012; Schouwenaars et al. 2014). We investigated if adding another cue, specifically, topicality in a discourse context, helps the interpretation of which -questions in two groups of Dutch children (5;5, n = 15 and 8;5, n = 21). Using a referent-selection task, we manipulated number on the verb and postverbal NP to create unambiguous wh- questions. Moreover, the questions were pre... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Strangmann, Iris
Slomp, Anneke
van Hout, Angeliek
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2014
Reihe/Periodikum: Linguistics in the Netherlands ; Linguistics in the Netherlands 2014 ; volume 31, page 129-144 ; ISSN 0929-7332 1569-9919
Verlag/Hrsg.: John Benjamins Publishing Company
Schlagwörter: Linguistics and Language / Language and Linguistics
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-27047319
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/avt.31.10str

While Dutch welke ‘which’-questions are structurally ambiguous, number agreement cues can disambiguate them. Despite such agreement cues, children misinterpret object questions as subject questions (Metz et al. 2010, 2012; Schouwenaars et al. 2014). We investigated if adding another cue, specifically, topicality in a discourse context, helps the interpretation of which -questions in two groups of Dutch children (5;5, n = 15 and 8;5, n = 21). Using a referent-selection task, we manipulated number on the verb and postverbal NP to create unambiguous wh- questions. Moreover, the questions were preceded by a discourse which established a topic, relating either to the wh- referent or the postverbal NP referent. Nevertheless, both 5- and 8-year-olds misinterpreted object questions as subject questions, ignoring the number and topicality cues to resolve the (local) ambiguity of which- questions. Our results confirm the effect of a subject-first bias in children’s interpretation of wh- questions. We conclude that topicality, in combination with number agreement, is not strong enough to overrule this subject-first bias.