1.

Characteristics of GPs–online survey (n = 15) and interviews (n = 14), N = 29.

2.

Characteristics of GPs–online survey (n = 15) and interviews (n = 14), N = 29.

3.

Characteristics of GPs–online survey (n = 15) and interviews (n = 14), N = 29.

4.

Characteristics of GPs–online survey (n = 15) and interviews (n = 14), N = 29.

1.

Collection formée par Nicolas DELAMARE sur l'administration et la police de Paris et de la France. CLXIX-CLXXI Affaires d'État. CLXIX.

2.

Collection formée par Nicolas DELAMARE sur l'administration et la police de Paris et de la France. CLXIX-CLXXI Affaires d'État. CLXIX.

3.

Collection formée par Nicolas DELAMARE sur l'administration et la police de Paris et de la France. CLXIX-CLXXI Affaires d'État. CLXIX.

4.

Collection formée par Nicolas DELAMARE sur l'administration et la police de Paris et de la France. CLXIX-CLXXI Affaires d'État. CLXIX.

1.

Selected, minimum, and maximum Manning’s coefficients [64] tested during sensitivity analysis for landcover present in the floodplain near the San Saba River, TX, U.S.A used in a 2...

2.

Selected, minimum, and maximum Manning’s coefficients [64] tested during sensitivity analysis for landcover present in the floodplain near the San Saba River, TX, U.S.A used in a 2...

3.

Selected, minimum, and maximum Manning’s coefficients [64] tested during sensitivity analysis for landcover present in the floodplain near the San Saba River, TX, U.S.A used in a 2...

4.

Selected, minimum, and maximum Manning’s coefficients [64] tested during sensitivity analysis for landcover present in the floodplain near the San Saba River, TX, U.S.A used in a 2...

5.

Selected, minimum, and maximum Manning’s coefficients [64] tested during sensitivity analysis for landcover present in the floodplain near the San Saba River, TX, U.S.A used in a 2...

6.

Selected, minimum, and maximum Manning’s coefficients [64] tested during sensitivity analysis for landcover present in the floodplain near the San Saba River, TX, U.S.A used in a 2...

7.

Selected, minimum, and maximum Manning’s coefficients [64] tested during sensitivity analysis for landcover present in the floodplain near the San Saba River, TX, U.S.A used in a 2...

8.

Selected, minimum, and maximum Manning’s coefficients [64] tested during sensitivity analysis for landcover present in the floodplain near the San Saba River, TX, U.S.A used in a 2...

9.

Selected, minimum, and maximum Manning’s coefficients [64] tested during sensitivity analysis for landcover present in the floodplain near the San Saba River, TX, U.S.A used in a 2...

1.

Average ± standard deviation of hydraulic conditions for simulated flow events at 200 sampling sites in the upper San Saba River, TX.

2.

Average ± standard deviation of hydraulic conditions for simulated flow events at 200 sampling sites in the upper San Saba River, TX.

3.

Average ± standard deviation of hydraulic conditions for simulated flow events at 200 sampling sites in the upper San Saba River, TX.

4.

Average ± standard deviation of hydraulic conditions for simulated flow events at 200 sampling sites in the upper San Saba River, TX.

5.

Average ± standard deviation of hydraulic conditions for simulated flow events at 200 sampling sites in the upper San Saba River, TX.

6.

Average ± standard deviation of hydraulic conditions for simulated flow events at 200 sampling sites in the upper San Saba River, TX.

7.

Average ± standard deviation of hydraulic conditions for simulated flow events at 200 sampling sites in the upper San Saba River, TX.

8.

Average ± standard deviation of hydraulic conditions for simulated flow events at 200 sampling sites in the upper San Saba River, TX.

9.

Average ± standard deviation of hydraulic conditions for simulated flow events at 200 sampling sites in the upper San Saba River, TX.

1.

Estimates of median average hydraulic variables (median ± standard deviation) for 200 sites in the San Saba River, TX given minimum, selected, and maximum Manning’s coefficients fo...

2.

Estimates of median average hydraulic variables (median ± standard deviation) for 200 sites in the San Saba River, TX given minimum, selected, and maximum Manning’s coefficients fo...

3.

Estimates of median average hydraulic variables (median ± standard deviation) for 200 sites in the San Saba River, TX given minimum, selected, and maximum Manning’s coefficients fo...

4.

Estimates of median average hydraulic variables (median ± standard deviation) for 200 sites in the San Saba River, TX given minimum, selected, and maximum Manning’s coefficients fo...

5.

Estimates of median average hydraulic variables (median ± standard deviation) for 200 sites in the San Saba River, TX given minimum, selected, and maximum Manning’s coefficients fo...

6.

Estimates of median average hydraulic variables (median ± standard deviation) for 200 sites in the San Saba River, TX given minimum, selected, and maximum Manning’s coefficients fo...

7.

Estimates of median average hydraulic variables (median ± standard deviation) for 200 sites in the San Saba River, TX given minimum, selected, and maximum Manning’s coefficients fo...

8.

Estimates of median average hydraulic variables (median ± standard deviation) for 200 sites in the San Saba River, TX given minimum, selected, and maximum Manning’s coefficients fo...

9.

Estimates of median average hydraulic variables (median ± standard deviation) for 200 sites in the San Saba River, TX given minimum, selected, and maximum Manning’s coefficients fo...

1.

Spearman correlation coefficients (r) between hydraulic variables and mussel indicators at the site scale.

2.

Spearman correlation coefficients (r) between hydraulic variables and mussel indicators at the site scale.

3.

Spearman correlation coefficients (r) between hydraulic variables and mussel indicators at the site scale.

4.

Spearman correlation coefficients (r) between hydraulic variables and mussel indicators at the site scale.

5.

Spearman correlation coefficients (r) between hydraulic variables and mussel indicators at the site scale.

6.

Spearman correlation coefficients (r) between hydraulic variables and mussel indicators at the site scale.

7.

Spearman correlation coefficients (r) between hydraulic variables and mussel indicators at the site scale.

8.

Spearman correlation coefficients (r) between hydraulic variables and mussel indicators at the site scale.

9.

Spearman correlation coefficients (r) between hydraulic variables and mussel indicators at the site scale.

1.

Spearman correlation coefficients (r) between hydraulic variables and mussel indicators at the mesohabitat scale.

2.

Spearman correlation coefficients (r) between hydraulic variables and mussel indicators at the mesohabitat scale.

3.

Spearman correlation coefficients (r) between hydraulic variables and mussel indicators at the mesohabitat scale.

4.

Spearman correlation coefficients (r) between hydraulic variables and mussel indicators at the mesohabitat scale.

5.

Spearman correlation coefficients (r) between hydraulic variables and mussel indicators at the mesohabitat scale.

6.

Spearman correlation coefficients (r) between hydraulic variables and mussel indicators at the mesohabitat scale.

7.

Spearman correlation coefficients (r) between hydraulic variables and mussel indicators at the mesohabitat scale.

8.

Spearman correlation coefficients (r) between hydraulic variables and mussel indicators at the mesohabitat scale.

9.

Spearman correlation coefficients (r) between hydraulic variables and mussel indicators at the mesohabitat scale.

1.

S1 Fig -

2.

S1 Fig -

3.

S1 Fig -

4.

S1 Fig -

5.

S1 Fig -

6.

S1 Fig -

7.

S1 Fig -

8.

S1 Fig -

9.

S1 Fig -

1.

S2 Fig -

2.

S2 Fig -

3.

S2 Fig -

4.

S2 Fig -

5.

S2 Fig -

6.

S2 Fig -

7.

S2 Fig -

8.

S2 Fig -

9.

S2 Fig -

1.

S3 Fig -

2.

S3 Fig -

3.

S3 Fig -

4.

S3 Fig -

5.

S3 Fig -

6.

S3 Fig -

7.

S3 Fig -

8.

S3 Fig -

9.

S3 Fig -