Legal and Policy Infrastructures of Returns in the EU - Comparative Report (WP2)

Work Package 2 (WP2) of the GAPs Project (Legal and Policy Frameworks of Returns in theEU) focuses on the legal, institutional and policy frameworks regarding the return andreadmission policies at the EU level and in the five selected EU member consortium countries(Sweden, Poland, Germany, Greece, Netherlands) as well as the related gaps. Three countrysnapshots of the non-consortium EU Member States (Italy, France, and Hungary) are alsoprovided. This comparative report is based on the examination and comparison of the return policies of the selected countries through the country dossiers that... Mehr ...

Verfasser: GÖKALP ARAS, N. Ela
ÖZTÜRK, Neva Övünç
STRIK, Tineke
THORBURN STERN, Rebecca
TRYLIŃSKA, Anna
YÜKSEL, Umutcan
Dokumenttyp: report
Erscheinungsdatum: 2024
Verlag/Hrsg.: GAPs: Decentring the Study of Migrant Returns and Readmission Policies in Europe and Beyond
Schlagwörter: Readmission / Return policies / Migration / Germany / Sweden / Netherlands / Greece / Poland / EU's Legal and Policy Framework of Migration Returns
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29634416
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11222075

Work Package 2 (WP2) of the GAPs Project (Legal and Policy Frameworks of Returns in theEU) focuses on the legal, institutional and policy frameworks regarding the return andreadmission policies at the EU level and in the five selected EU member consortium countries(Sweden, Poland, Germany, Greece, Netherlands) as well as the related gaps. Three countrysnapshots of the non-consortium EU Member States (Italy, France, and Hungary) are alsoprovided. This comparative report is based on the examination and comparison of the return policies of the selected countries through the country dossiers that are provided as annexes of this report (see other reports in GAPs-WP2 publication series). It aims to identify the commonalities and variances within their legal and policy structures concerning the return of migrants against the backdrop of overarching EU directives, particularly the EU Return Directive. This exploration includes a comprehensive examination of fundamental statistics, significant political changes in this realm, and a comparative analysis of the institutional frameworks. The corelegal framework addressed in the report is distilled into three sub-sections, pinpointed by examining the identified “gaps” across all reports. These prominent areas of concern,“Procedure to Issue Return Decisions”, “Procedural Safeguards and Non-Returnability”, and“Detention”, have been analysed comparatively.