A dynamic Markov model to assess the cost-effectiveness of the Kidney Team at Home intervention in The Netherlands

Objectives: The Kidney Team at Home program is an educational intervention aimed at patients with chronic kidney disease to assist them in their choice for kidney replacement therapy. Previous studies have shown that the intervention results in an increase in knowledge and communication on kidney replacement therapy, and eventually in an increase in the number of living donor kidney transplantations. The study assesses the cost-effectiveness of the intervention compared to standard care. Methods: A dynamic probabilistic Markov model was used to estimate the monetary and health benefits of the... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Redeker, Steef
Ismail, Sohal
Eeren, Hester V.
Massey, Emma K.
Weimar, Willem
Oppe, Mark
Busschbach, Jan
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2021
Reihe/Periodikum: Redeker , S , Ismail , S , Eeren , H V , Massey , E K , Weimar , W , Oppe , M , Busschbach , J & the Kidney Team at Home consortium 2021 , ' A dynamic Markov model to assess the cost-effectiveness of the Kidney Team at Home intervention in The Netherlands ' , European Journal of Health Economics . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-021-01383-0
Schlagwörter: /dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/good_health_and_well_being / SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29626459
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://pure.eur.nl/en/publications/dc72145a-d82a-414d-877b-4ab91ad870a7

Objectives: The Kidney Team at Home program is an educational intervention aimed at patients with chronic kidney disease to assist them in their choice for kidney replacement therapy. Previous studies have shown that the intervention results in an increase in knowledge and communication on kidney replacement therapy, and eventually in an increase in the number of living donor kidney transplantations. The study assesses the cost-effectiveness of the intervention compared to standard care. Methods: A dynamic probabilistic Markov model was used to estimate the monetary and health benefits of the intervention in The Netherlands over 10 years. Data on costs and health-related quality of life were derived from the literature. Transition probabilities, prevalence, and incidence rates were calculated using a large national database. An optimistic and a pessimistic implementation scenario were compared to a base case scenario with standard care. Results: In both the optimistic and pessimistic scenario, the intervention is cost-effective and dominant compared to standard care: savings were €108,681,985 and €51,770,060 and the benefits were 1382 and 695 QALYs, respectively. Conclusions: The superior cost-effectiveness of the intervention is caused by the superior health effects and the reduction of costs associated with transplantation, and the relatively small incremental costs of the intervention. The favorable findings of this implementation project resulted in national uptake of the intervention in The Netherlands as of 2021. This is the first time a psychosocial intervention has been implemented as part of standard care in a kidney replacement therapy program worldwide.