The first multicentre study on coronary anomalies in the Netherlands: MuSCAT

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines on coronary anomalies are primarily based on expert consensus and a limited number of trials. A gold standard for diagnosis and a consensus on the treatment strategy in this patient group are lacking, especially for patients with an anomalous origin of a coronary artery from the opposite sinus of Valsalva (ACAOS) with an interarterial course. AIM: To provide evidence-substantiated recommendations for diagnostic work-up, treatment and follow-up of patients with anomalous coronary arteries. METHODS: A clinical care pathway for patients with ACAOS was established by... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Koppel, C J
Driesen, B W
de Winter, R J
van den Bosch, A E
van Kimmenade, R
Wagenaar, L J
Jukema, J W
Hazekamp, M G
van der Kley, F
Jongbloed, M R M
Kiès, P
Egorova, A D
Verheijen, D B H
Damman, P
Schoof, P H
Wilschut, J
Stoel, M
Speekenbrink, R G H
Voskuil, M
Vliegen, H W
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2021
Schlagwörter: Anomalous coronary artery from the opposite sinus of Valsalva / Anomalous coronary artery from the pulmonary artery / Coronary anomalies / Coronary arteriovenous fistula / Multicentre study / Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine / Journal Article
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29620496
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/442590

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines on coronary anomalies are primarily based on expert consensus and a limited number of trials. A gold standard for diagnosis and a consensus on the treatment strategy in this patient group are lacking, especially for patients with an anomalous origin of a coronary artery from the opposite sinus of Valsalva (ACAOS) with an interarterial course. AIM: To provide evidence-substantiated recommendations for diagnostic work-up, treatment and follow-up of patients with anomalous coronary arteries. METHODS: A clinical care pathway for patients with ACAOS was established by six Dutch centres. Prospectively included patients undergo work-up according to protocol using computed tomography (CT) angiography, ischaemia detection, echocardiography and coronary angiography with intracoronary measurements to assess anatomical and physiological characteristics of the ACAOS. Surgical and functional follow-up results are evaluated by CT angiography, ischaemia detection and a quality-of-life questionnaire. Patient inclusion for the first multicentre study on coronary anomalies in the Netherlands started in 2020 and will continue for at least 3 years with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. For patients with a right or left coronary artery originating from the pulmonary artery and coronary arteriovenous fistulas a registry is maintained. RESULTS: Primary outcomes are: (cardiac) death, myocardial ischaemia attributable to the ACAOS, re-intervention after surgery and intervention after initially conservative treatment. The influence of work-up examinations on treatment choice is also evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Structural evidence for the appropriate management of patients with coronary anomalies, especially (interarterial) ACAOS, is lacking. By means of a structured care pathway in a multicentre setting, we aim to provide an evidence-based strategy for the diagnostic evaluation and treatment of this patient group.