Development of the Patient’s Experience and Attitude Colposcopy Eindhoven Questionnaire (PEACE-q)
Background No validated instruments for the evaluation of patient satisfaction in colposcopy do exist. Therefore, this study reports on the development of a Patient’s Experience and Attitude to Colposcopy questionnaire. Methods Patients who recently received colposcopy participated in a focus group. A panel of experts evaluated the transcriptions and agreed on a 15-item draft questionnaire. The draft questionnaire was completed by 68 women who subsequently came for a colposcopy. For construct validation, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were performed as... Mehr ...
Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Dokumenttyp: | Artikel |
Erscheinungsdatum: | 2019 |
Reihe/Periodikum: | Pop , V J M , Wouters , T , Bekkers , R L M , Spek , V R M & Piek , J M J 2019 , ' Development of the Patient’s Experience and Attitude Colposcopy Eindhoven Questionnaire (PEACE-q) ' , BMC Health Services Research , vol. 19 , no. 1 , 589 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4425-2 |
Schlagwörter: | Adult / Aged / Anxiety/psychology / Colposcopy/psychology / Factor Analysis / Statistical / Female / Focus Groups / Humans / Middle Aged / Netherlands / Patient Satisfaction / Psychometrics / Reproducibility of Results / Surveys and Questionnaires/standards / Colposcopy / ANXIETY / INFORMATION / Satisfaction / Patient caregiver attitude / CARE / patient's experience |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Permalink: | https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29610075 |
Datenquelle: | BASE; Originalkatalog |
Powered By: | BASE |
Link(s) : | https://research.tilburguniversity.edu/en/publications/1ab1f94a-dfb8-4eae-9127-e3f1c403c1bf |
Background No validated instruments for the evaluation of patient satisfaction in colposcopy do exist. Therefore, this study reports on the development of a Patient’s Experience and Attitude to Colposcopy questionnaire. Methods Patients who recently received colposcopy participated in a focus group. A panel of experts evaluated the transcriptions and agreed on a 15-item draft questionnaire. The draft questionnaire was completed by 68 women who subsequently came for a colposcopy. For construct validation, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were performed as well as reliability analysis. Concurrent validity was assessed with the 4-item Patient Health questionnaire (PHQ-4). Results Construct validation resulted in an 8-item patient perception scale with good psychometric properties (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.76) and excellent model fit. Two subscales could be discriminated: patient procedure perception scale (alpha: 0.89) and caregiver attitude perception scale (alpha: 0.71). Both subscales intercorrelated moderately (r = 0.28, p = 0.045). The subscale patient perception correlated significantly with the PHQ-4 scale and its anxiety subscale, not with the depression subscale. Conclusions We developed a Patient’s Experience and Attitude to Colposcopy questionnaire with adequate psychometric properties. Future application in out-patient clinics should further evaluate its clinical relevance.