Students’ and junior doctors’ perspectives on radiology education in medical school: a qualitative study in the Netherlands

Abstract Background Modern medicine becomes more dependent on radiologic imaging techniques. Over the past decade, radiology has also gained more attention in the medical curricula. However, little is known with regard to students’ perspectives on this subject. Therefore, this study aims to gain insight into the thoughts and ideas of medical students and junior doctors on radiology education in medical curricula. Methods A qualitative, descriptive study was carried out at one medical university in the Netherlands. Participants were recruited on social media and were interviewed following a pre... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Frederike S. Harthoorn
Sascha W. J. Scharenborg
Monique Brink
Liesbeth Peters-Bax
Dylan J. H. A. Henssen
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2024
Reihe/Periodikum: BMC Medical Education, Vol 24, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2024)
Verlag/Hrsg.: BMC
Schlagwörter: Radiology Education / Medical School Curriculum / Learning objectives / Students’ perspectives / Special aspects of education / LC8-6691 / Medicine / R
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29590482
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05460-9

Abstract Background Modern medicine becomes more dependent on radiologic imaging techniques. Over the past decade, radiology has also gained more attention in the medical curricula. However, little is known with regard to students’ perspectives on this subject. Therefore, this study aims to gain insight into the thoughts and ideas of medical students and junior doctors on radiology education in medical curricula. Methods A qualitative, descriptive study was carried out at one medical university in the Netherlands. Participants were recruited on social media and were interviewed following a predefined topic list. The constant comparative method was applied in order to include new questions when unexpected topics arose during the interviews. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded. Codes were organized into categories and themes by discussion between researchers. Results Fifteen participants (nine junior doctors and six students) agreed to join. From the coded interviews, four themes derived from fifteen categories arose: (1) The added value of radiology education in medical curricula, (2) Indispensable knowledge on radiology, (3) Organization of radiology education and (4) Promising educational innovations for the radiology curriculum. Conclusion This study suggests that medical students and junior doctors value radiology education. It provides insights in educational topics and forms for educational improvement for radiology educators.