Consumption Taxes and Income InequalityAn International Perspective with Microsimulation ; Consumption Taxes and Income InequalityAn International Perspective with Microsimulation: LIS working papers series-No. 785

LIS working papers series-No. 785 ; Consumption taxes are often considered as the most anti-redistributive componentof the tax system. Yet, very few estimates, and fewer international comparisons of theredistributive impact of consumption taxes exist in the literature, due to scarce dataon household expenditures. We use household budget surveys and microsimulation toprovide consistent estimates of the regressivity of consumption taxes for a large panelof countries and years. We propose a new method for imputing consumption expen-diture across countries, using widely available data on income an... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Blasco, Julien
Guillaud, Elvire
Zemmour, Michaël
Dokumenttyp: preprint
Erscheinungsdatum: 2020
Verlag/Hrsg.: HAL CCSD
Schlagwörter: Indirect taxes / Redistributive Effect / Consumption / Income / Microsimulation / Luxembourg Income Study / [SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29522575
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://hal.science/hal-02735145

LIS working papers series-No. 785 ; Consumption taxes are often considered as the most anti-redistributive componentof the tax system. Yet, very few estimates, and fewer international comparisons of theredistributive impact of consumption taxes exist in the literature, due to scarce dataon household expenditures. We use household budget surveys and microsimulation toprovide consistent estimates of the regressivity of consumption taxes for a large panelof countries and years. We propose a new method for imputing consumption expen-diture across countries, using widely available data on income and socio-demographiccharacteristics of households. We show that including the distribution of housing rents,when data is available, to impute households’ consumption greatly improves the pre-diction of the model. Our results are threefold. First, there is a 1 to 2 ratio betweenthe propensity to consume of the top decile (around 50% of their income) and thatof the bottom decile (100% of income). Second, consumption taxes entail a signifi-cant rise in the Gini coefficient of income (between 0.01 and 0.04 point), yet of muchsmaller magnitude than the positive redistribution operated by direct taxes and trans-fers. Third, cross-country differences in the distributive effect of consumption taxes aremainly explained by variations in the tax rate (from 7 to 24% in our sample), ratherthan variations in the distribution of consumption, since everywhere the propensity toconsume declines sharply with income.