Media representation of regulated incivilities: relevant actors, problems, solutions and the role played by experts in the Flemish press
This article analyses the representations of regulated nuisance in a section of Flemish newspapers overtime. It identifies the groups of people who have been successful in conveying messages in and through Flemish press news, and explores the way they have represented problems of, and suggested solutions to, regulated incivilities over the years. Furthermore, against the backdrop of newsmaking criminology, it considers whether and how crime and justice experts have contributed to shaping the Flemish media discourse on regulated incivilities overtime. Overall the analysis of press news has foun... Mehr ...
Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Dokumenttyp: | journalarticle |
Erscheinungsdatum: | 2016 |
Schlagwörter: | Social Sciences / NEWSMAKING / PUBLIC CRIMINOLOGY / newsmaking criminology / regulated incivilities / media representations / media analysis / Flemish Region (Belgium) |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Permalink: | https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29482063 |
Datenquelle: | BASE; Originalkatalog |
Powered By: | BASE |
Link(s) : | https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/7189090 |
This article analyses the representations of regulated nuisance in a section of Flemish newspapers overtime. It identifies the groups of people who have been successful in conveying messages in and through Flemish press news, and explores the way they have represented problems of, and suggested solutions to, regulated incivilities over the years. Furthermore, against the backdrop of newsmaking criminology, it considers whether and how crime and justice experts have contributed to shaping the Flemish media discourse on regulated incivilities overtime. Overall the analysis of press news has found that the press, by giving coverage to the voices of local institutional actors, has promoted the criminalisation of nuisance and, especially, of physical incivilities. The views of criminological experts, by contrast, have remained marginal. The article concludes by suggesting how such findings present a new set of empirical and conceptual challenges for newsmaking criminology, and more generally, for public criminology.