A randomized phase 2 study exploring the role of bevacizumab and a chemotherapy-free approach in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: The HAT study (BOOG 2008-2003), a Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group trial

BACKGROUND: To explore the role of bevacizumab and a chemotherapy-free approach, the authors evaluated the combination of bevacizumab, trastuzumab, and paclitaxel (HAT) and the regimen of trastuzumab and bevacizumab (HA) with the addition of paclitaxel after progression (HA-HAT) as first-line treatment for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: In a noncomparative phase 2 trial, patients were randomized between HAT and HA-HAT. The primary endpoint was the progression-free rate at 1 year (1-year PFR). In the HA-HAT group, progre... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Drooger, J.C. (Jan)
Tinteren, H. (Harm) van
de Groot, S.M. (Steffen M.)
Tije, A.J. (Albert Jan) ten
Graaf, H. (Hiltje) de
Portielje, J.E.A. (Johanneke )
Jager, A. (Agnes)
Honkoop, A.H. (Aafke H)
Linn, S.C. (Sabine)
Kroep, J.R. (Judith)
Erdkamp, F.L.G. (Frans )
Hamberg, A.P. (Paul)
Imholz, A.L.T. (Alex L. T.)
van Rossum-Schornagel, Q.C. (Quirine C.)
Heijns, J.B. (Joan)
Leeuwen-Stok, A.E. van
Sleijfer, S. (Stefan)
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2016
Schlagwörter: Bevacizumab / Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 / Metastatic breast cancer / Paclitaxel / Trastuzumab
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29451869
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : http://repub.eur.nl/pub/94106

BACKGROUND: To explore the role of bevacizumab and a chemotherapy-free approach, the authors evaluated the combination of bevacizumab, trastuzumab, and paclitaxel (HAT) and the regimen of trastuzumab and bevacizumab (HA) with the addition of paclitaxel after progression (HA-HAT) as first-line treatment for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: In a noncomparative phase 2 trial, patients were randomized between HAT and HA-HAT. The primary endpoint was the progression-free rate at 1 year (1-year PFR). In the HA-HAT group, progression-free survival (PFS) was separately established for HA (PFS1) and HAT (PFS2). RESULTS: Eighty-four patients received HAT (n = 39) or HA-HAT (n = 45). The 1-year PFR was 74.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 61.8%-89.4%) and 62.2% (95% CI, 49.6%-89.4%) in the HAT and HA-HAT arms, respectively. The median PFS was 19.8 months (95% CI, 14.9-25.6 months) in the HAT arm and 19.6 months (95% CI, 12.0-32.0 months) in the HA-HAT arm. In the HA-HAT arm, the median PFS1 was 10.4 months (95% CI, 6.2-15.0 months), and the median PFS2 was 8.2 months (95% CI, 7.0-12.6 months). The number and severity of adverse events were comparable between the arms. CONCLUSIONS: Both HAT and HA-HAT have promising activity in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. In particular, starting with only targeted agents and delaying chemotherapy is worth further exploration.