Dutch genome diagnostic laboratories accelerated and improved variant interpretation and increased accuracy by sharing data

Each year diagnostic laboratories in the Netherlands profile thousands of individuals for heritable disease using next‐generation sequencing (NGS). This requires pathogenicity classification of millions of DNA variants on the standard 5‐tier scale. To reduce time spent on data interpretation and increase data quality and reliability, the nine Dutch labs decided to publicly share their classifications. Variant classifications of nearly 100,000 unique variants were catalogued and compared in a centralized MOLGENIS database. Variants classified by more than one center were labeled as “consensus”... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Fokkema, I.
Velde, K. (KJoeri) van der
Slofstra, M.K.
Ruivenkamp, C.A. (Claudia)
Vogel, M.J. (Maartje)
Pfundt, R. (Rolph)
Blok, M.J.C.
Deprez, R.H.L.
Waisfisz, Q. (Quinten)
Abbott, K.M. (Kristin)
Sinke, R.J. (Richard)
Rahman, R. (Rosanna)
Nijman, I.J. (Isaac )
Koning, B.A.E. (Barbara) de
Thijs, G.
Wieskamp, N.
Moritz, R.J.G.
Charbon, B.
Saris, J.J. (Jasper)
Dunnen, J.T. (Johan) den
Laros, J.F.J. (Jeroen F.)
Bakker, P.I.W. (Paul) de
Gijn, M. (Marielle) van
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2019
Schlagwörter: data sharing / database / diagnostics / NGS / whole‐exome sequencing
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29451356
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : http://repub.eur.nl/pub/122238

Each year diagnostic laboratories in the Netherlands profile thousands of individuals for heritable disease using next‐generation sequencing (NGS). This requires pathogenicity classification of millions of DNA variants on the standard 5‐tier scale. To reduce time spent on data interpretation and increase data quality and reliability, the nine Dutch labs decided to publicly share their classifications. Variant classifications of nearly 100,000 unique variants were catalogued and compared in a centralized MOLGENIS database. Variants classified by more than one center were labeled as “consensus” w