Fig 3 -

Posterior distribution for the absolute effect sizes (Cohen’s d) of the intervention for Understanding scores (A) and No Concept scores (B) with the median and 66% and 95% CI (Effect size labels according to Calin-Jageman and Cumming [ 85 ]). Group 1 = intervention between Occ1 & Occ2; Group 2 = intervention between Occ2 & Occ3.

Volltext
Verfasser: Jimmy van Rijt (12042045)
Debra Myhill (12042048)
Sven De Maeyer (288313)
Peter-Arno Coppen (12042051)
Dokumenttyp: Image
Erscheinungsdatum: 2022
Schlagwörter: Medicine / Biotechnology / Sociology / Science Policy / Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified / year old pre / thus important clues / switching replications design / inaccurate way ) / additional qualitative analyses / blindly &# 8217 / blind &# 8217 / tackling grammatical problems / explaining grammatical problems / robust empirical research / students &# 8217 / increased &# 8216 / l1 grammatical understanding / increased grammatical understanding / improve grammatical understanding / negative side effect / l1 education evidence / intervention tasks provided / grammatical reasoning ability / found positive effects / blind concept use / &# 8216 / grammatical understanding / growing understanding / university students / similar effect / previous research / negative byproduct / large effects / concept use / grammatical concepts / xlink \ / > / study found / previous work / postintervention designs / might actually / methodological improvement / method quasi / metaconceptual interventions / metaconceptual intervention / linguistic metaconcepts / great need / gradual process / e . / dutch quasi
Sprache: unknown
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29435413
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263123.g003