The 2021 Dutch Working Party on Antibiotic Policy (SWAB) guidelines for empirical antibacterial therapy of sepsis in adults ...

Abstract Background The Dutch Working Party on Antibiotic Policy (SWAB) in collaboration with relevant professional societies, has updated their evidence-based guidelines on empiric antibacterial therapy of sepsis in adults. Methods Our multidisciplinary guideline committee generated ten population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) questions relevant for adult patients with sepsis. For each question, a literature search was performed to obtain the best available evidence and assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The qu... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Sieswerda, Elske
Bax, Hannelore I.
Hoogerwerf, Jacobien J.
de Boer, Mark G. J.
Boermeester, Marja
Bonten, Marc J. M.
Dekker, Douwe
van Wijk, Roy Gerth
Juffermans, Nicole P.
Kuindersma, Marnix
van der Linden, Paul D.
Melles, Damian C.
Pickkers, Peter
Schouten, Jeroen A.
Rebel, Jasper R.
van Zanten, Arthur R. H.
Prins, Jan M.
Wiersinga, W. Joost
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2022
Verlag/Hrsg.: figshare
Schlagwörter: Medicine / Pharmacology / Biotechnology / Sociology / FOS: Sociology / Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified / Hematology / Infectious Diseases / FOS: Health sciences
Sprache: unknown
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29399820
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6145287.v1

Abstract Background The Dutch Working Party on Antibiotic Policy (SWAB) in collaboration with relevant professional societies, has updated their evidence-based guidelines on empiric antibacterial therapy of sepsis in adults. Methods Our multidisciplinary guideline committee generated ten population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) questions relevant for adult patients with sepsis. For each question, a literature search was performed to obtain the best available evidence and assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The quality of evidence for clinically relevant outcomes was graded from high to very low. In structured consensus meetings, the committee formulated recommendations as strong or weak. When evidence could not be obtained, recommendations were provided based on expert opinion and experience (good practice statements). Results Fifty-five recommendations on the antibacterial therapy of sepsis were generated. Recommendations on ...