Health professionals’ perceptions about their clinical performance and the influence of audit and feedback on their intentions to improve practice: a theory-based study in Dutch intensive care units ...

Abstract Background Audit and feedback aims to guide health professionals in improving aspects of their practice that need it most. Evidence suggests that feedback fails to increase accuracy of professional perceptions about clinical performance, which likely reduces audit and feedback effectiveness. This study investigates health professionals’ perceptions about their clinical performance and the influence of feedback on their intentions to change practice. Methods We conducted an online laboratory experiment guided by Control Theory with 72 intensive care professionals from 21 units. For eac... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Gude, Wouter
Roos-Blom, Marie-José
van der Veer, Sabine
Dongelmans, Dave
de Jonge, Evert
Francis, Jill
Peek, Niels
de Keizer, Nicolette
Dokumenttyp: Datenquelle
Erscheinungsdatum: 2018
Verlag/Hrsg.: figshare
Schlagwörter: Medicine / Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified / Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified / Science Policy / Mental Health
Sprache: unknown
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29399557
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4008424

Abstract Background Audit and feedback aims to guide health professionals in improving aspects of their practice that need it most. Evidence suggests that feedback fails to increase accuracy of professional perceptions about clinical performance, which likely reduces audit and feedback effectiveness. This study investigates health professionals’ perceptions about their clinical performance and the influence of feedback on their intentions to change practice. Methods We conducted an online laboratory experiment guided by Control Theory with 72 intensive care professionals from 21 units. For each of four new pain management indicators, we collected professionals’ perceptions about their clinical performance; peer performance; targets; and improvement intentions before and after receiving first-time feedback. An electronic audit and feedback dashboard provided ICU’s own performance, median and top 10% peer performance, and improvement recommendations. The experiment took place approximately 1 month before units ...