Organisation and quality monitoring for point-of-care testing (POCT) in Belgium: proposal for an expansion of the legal framework for POCT into primary health care

Background There is a trend towards decentralisation of laboratory tests by means of Point-of-Care testing (POCT). Within hospitals, Belgian law requires a POCT policy, coordinated by the clinical laboratory. There is however no legal framework for POCT performed outside the hospital: no reimbursement, no compulsory quality monitoring and no limits nor control on the prices charged to the patient. Uncontrolled use of POCT can have negative consequences for individual and public health. Proposal We propose that POCT outside hospitals would only be reimbursed for tests carried out within a legal... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Van Hoof , Viviane
Barglazan, Dragos
Blairon, Laurent
Braekevelt, Bob
Debois, Regis
De Vos, Nathalie Veronique J.
Gruson , Damien
Jonckheere, Jef
Lanckmans, Katrien
Moens , Marc
Peeters, Bart
PENDERS, Joris
Roman, Alain
Van Hoovels , Lieve
Vanstapel, Florent
Verbakel, Jan Y.
Verdonck , Ann
Verstraete, Alain G.
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2022
Verlag/Hrsg.: TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
Schlagwörter: Point-of-care testing / POCT / primary care / legal framework / quality
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29375447
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : http://hdl.handle.net/1942/37046

Background There is a trend towards decentralisation of laboratory tests by means of Point-of-Care testing (POCT). Within hospitals, Belgian law requires a POCT policy, coordinated by the clinical laboratory. There is however no legal framework for POCT performed outside the hospital: no reimbursement, no compulsory quality monitoring and no limits nor control on the prices charged to the patient. Uncontrolled use of POCT can have negative consequences for individual and public health. Proposal We propose that POCT outside hospitals would only be reimbursed for tests carried out within a legal framework, requiring evidence-based testing and collaboration with a clinical laboratory, because clinical laboratories have procedures for test validation and quality monitoring, are equipped for electronic data transfer, are familiar with logistical processes, can provide support when technical issues arise and can organise and certify training. Under these conditions the government investment will be offset by health benefits, e.g. fall in antibiotic consumption with POCT for CRP in primary care, quick response to SARS-CoV2-positive cases in COVID-19 triage centres. Priorities 1 degrees extension of the Belgian decree on certification of clinical laboratories to decentralised tests in primary care; 2 degrees introduction of a separate reimbursement category for POCT; 3 degrees introduction of reimbursement for a limited number of specified POCT; 4 degrees setup of a Multidisciplinary POCT Advisory Council, the purpose of which is to draw up a model for reimbursement of POCT, to select tests eligible for reimbursement and to make proposals to the National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance (RIZIV/INAMI). ; No funding was received for this work. Meetings of the members of the Working Group POCT with external experts on POCT were facilitated by Roche Diagnostics Belgium (Machelen, Belgium).