Historische televisie à la Van Oostrom en Conscience?
In this contribution I make a comparative analysis of Het verhaal van Nederland (The story of the Netherlands) and Het verhaal van Vlaanderen (The story of Flanders) as historical productions, from the perspective of public history. I focus on three domains that are important to public historians. First, I will discuss the production contexts of both series, because they determine the framework wherein historians provide their expertise. I then analyse the maintained narrative techniques and how they shape the content, and whether or not these techniques distort the historical narrative. Final... Mehr ...
| Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Dokumenttyp: | Artikel |
| Erscheinungsdatum: | 2024 |
| Reihe/Periodikum: | BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review, Vol 139, Iss 1 (2024) |
| Verlag/Hrsg.: |
openjournals.nl
|
| Schlagwörter: | Het Verhaal van Nederland / Het Verhaal van Vlaanderen / Publieksgeschiedenis / History of Low Countries - Benelux Countries / DH1-925 |
| Sprache: | Englisch Niederländisch |
| Permalink: | https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29275129 |
| Datenquelle: | BASE; Originalkatalog |
| Powered By: | BASE |
| Link(s) : | https://doi.org/10.51769/bmgn-lchr.17757 |
In this contribution I make a comparative analysis of Het verhaal van Nederland (The story of the Netherlands) and Het verhaal van Vlaanderen (The story of Flanders) as historical productions, from the perspective of public history. I focus on three domains that are important to public historians. First, I will discuss the production contexts of both series, because they determine the framework wherein historians provide their expertise. I then analyse the maintained narrative techniques and how they shape the content, and whether or not these techniques distort the historical narrative. Finally, I make a plea for a study of the broader reception of these series, in order to mark the value of this type of research for public history.