CT in relation to RT-PCR in diagnosing COVID-19 in The Netherlands: A prospective study

INTRODUCTION: Early differentiation between emergency department (ED) patients with and without corona virus disease (COVID-19) is very important. Chest CT scan may be helpful in early diagnosing of COVID-19. We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of CT using RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 as reference standard and investigated reasons for discordant results between the two tests. METHODS: In this prospective single centre study in the Netherlands, all adult symptomatic ED patients had both a CT scan and a RT-PCR upon arrival at the ED. CT results were compared with PCR test(s). Diagnostic accuracy wa... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Gietema, Hester A.
Zelis, Noortje
Nobel, J. Martijn
Lambriks, Lars
van Alphen, Lieke B.
Oude Lashof, Astrid M. L.
Wildberger, Joachim E.
Nelissen, Irene C.
Stassen, Patricia
Dokumenttyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2020
Schlagwörter: COVID-19 / Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction / Respiratory infections / Sepsis / Computed axial tomography / Pneumonia / Critical care and emergency medicine / Viral pathogens / Diagnostic medicine
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29216837
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://repository.publisso.de/resource/frl:6421798

INTRODUCTION: Early differentiation between emergency department (ED) patients with and without corona virus disease (COVID-19) is very important. Chest CT scan may be helpful in early diagnosing of COVID-19. We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of CT using RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 as reference standard and investigated reasons for discordant results between the two tests. METHODS: In this prospective single centre study in the Netherlands, all adult symptomatic ED patients had both a CT scan and a RT-PCR upon arrival at the ED. CT results were compared with PCR test(s). Diagnostic accuracy was calculated. Discordant results were investigated using discharge diagnoses. RESULTS: Between March 13th and March 24th 2020, 193 symptomatic ED patients were included. In total, 43.0% of patients had a positive PCR and 56.5% a positive CT, resulting in a sensitivity of 89.2%, specificity 68.2%, likelihood ratio (LR)+ 2.81 and LR- 0.16. Sensitivity was higher in patients with high risk pneumonia (CURB-65 score ≥3; n = 17, 100%) and with sepsis (SOFA score ≥2; n = 137, 95.5%). Of the 35 patients (31.8%) with a suspicious CT and a negative RT-PCR, 9 had another respiratory viral pathogen, and in 7 patients, COVID-19 was considered likely. One of nine patients with a non-suspicious CT and a positive PCR had developed symptoms within 48 hours before scanning. DISCUSSION: The accuracy of chest CT in symptomatic ED patients is high, but used as a single diagnostic test, CT can not safely diagnose or exclude COVID-19. However, CT can be used as a quick tool to categorize patients into “probably positive” and “probably negative” cohorts.