Developing the potential for change: Challenging power through social entrepreneurship in the Netherlands

Most research on social entrepreneurship overemphasizes agency by presenting social enterprising as something that originates solely from the intrinsic motivations of individual entrepreneurs. Research that does regard the impact of state power is almost exclusively anchored in and geared toward neoliberal policy contexts. This article examines the dialectics between state power and entrepreneurial counterpower in the institutional context of the Netherlands. Moreover, since social entrepreneurs develop different tactics and strategies for responding to challenges, we use Gaventa’s power cube... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Korstenbroek, Timo
Smets, Peer
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2019
Reihe/Periodikum: Korstenbroek , T & Smets , P 2019 , ' Developing the potential for change: Challenging power through social entrepreneurship in the Netherlands ' , Voluntas , vol. 30 , no. 3 , pp. 475-486 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00107-6
Schlagwörter: Governance / Participation / Power / Social entrepreneurship / Space / /dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/peace_justice_and_strong_institutions / name=SDG 16 - Peace / Justice and Strong Institutions / /dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/decent_work_and_economic_growth / name=SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29213437
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/2366b6da-0cc8-4d48-b128-75959daa274d

Most research on social entrepreneurship overemphasizes agency by presenting social enterprising as something that originates solely from the intrinsic motivations of individual entrepreneurs. Research that does regard the impact of state power is almost exclusively anchored in and geared toward neoliberal policy contexts. This article examines the dialectics between state power and entrepreneurial counterpower in the institutional context of the Netherlands. Moreover, since social entrepreneurs develop different tactics and strategies for responding to challenges, we use Gaventa’s power cube to distinguish forms of power and counterpower, which we then combine with the following inductively derived social entrepreneur typologies: successful hybrids, antagonistic organizers, and autonomous entrepreneurs. This offers insights into the development of theory in relation to the social entrepreneurial potential for change and civic participation.