Effectiveness of personal protective equipment and oseltamivir prophylaxis during avian influenza a (H7N7) epidemic, the netherlands, 2003

We analyzed the effectiveness of personal protective equipment and oseltamivir use during the 2003 avian influenza A (H7N7) epidemic in the Netherlands by linking databases containing information about farm visits, human infections, and use of oseltamivir and personal protective equipment. Using a stringent case defi nition, based on self-reported conjunctivitis combined with a positive hemagglutination- inhibition assay, we found that prophylactic treatment with oseltamivir significantly reduced the risk for infection per farm visit from 0.145 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.078-0.233) to 0.0... Mehr ...

Verfasser: te Beest, Dennis E.
van Boven, Michiel
Bos, Marian E.H.
Stegeman, Arjan
Koopmans, Marion P.G.
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2010
Reihe/Periodikum: te Beest , D E , van Boven , M , Bos , M E H , Stegeman , A & Koopmans , M P G 2010 , ' Effectiveness of personal protective equipment and oseltamivir prophylaxis during avian influenza a (H7N7) epidemic, the netherlands, 2003 ' , Emerging Infectious Diseases , vol. 16 , no. 10 , pp. 1562-1568 . https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1610.091412
Schlagwörter: /dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/good_health_and_well_being / name=SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29207772
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://pure.eur.nl/en/publications/a4119cc6-6e31-4499-b04a-ff5e41abdb63

We analyzed the effectiveness of personal protective equipment and oseltamivir use during the 2003 avian influenza A (H7N7) epidemic in the Netherlands by linking databases containing information about farm visits, human infections, and use of oseltamivir and personal protective equipment. Using a stringent case defi nition, based on self-reported conjunctivitis combined with a positive hemagglutination- inhibition assay, we found that prophylactic treatment with oseltamivir significantly reduced the risk for infection per farm visit from 0.145 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.078-0.233) to 0.031 (95% CI 0.008-0.073). The protective effect was ≈79% (95% CI 40%-97%). These results are comparable with the reported effect of prophylactic treatment with oseltamivir on human seasonal influenza. No significant protective effect was found for use of respirators or safety glasses, possibly because of limitations of the data.