Comparative genomics of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-Ec) reveals a similar distribution of the 10 most prevalent ESBL-Ec clones and ESBL genes among human community faecal and extra-intestinal infection isolates in the Netherlands (2014-17)

INTRODUCTION: The human gut microbiota is an important reservoir of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-Ec). Community surveillance studies of ESBL-Ec to monitor circulating clones and ESBL genes are logistically challenging and costly. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate if isolates obtained in routine clinical practice can be used as an alternative to monitor the distribution of clones and ESBL genes circulating in the community. METHODS: WGS was performed on 451 Dutch ESBL-Ec isolates (2014-17), including 162 community faeces and 289 urine and blood isolates. We compared proportions of 10 most freque... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Verschuuren, T D
van Hout, D
Arredondo-Alonso, S
Fluit, A C
Reuland, E A
Top, J
Schürch, A C
Bosch, T
Bonten, M J M
Kluytmans, J A J W
Willems, R J L
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2021
Schlagwörter: Microbiology (medical) / Infectious Diseases / Pharmacology (medical) / Pharmacology / Journal Article
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29203666
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/441902

INTRODUCTION: The human gut microbiota is an important reservoir of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-Ec). Community surveillance studies of ESBL-Ec to monitor circulating clones and ESBL genes are logistically challenging and costly. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate if isolates obtained in routine clinical practice can be used as an alternative to monitor the distribution of clones and ESBL genes circulating in the community. METHODS: WGS was performed on 451 Dutch ESBL-Ec isolates (2014-17), including 162 community faeces and 289 urine and blood isolates. We compared proportions of 10 most frequently identified STs, PopPUNK-based sequence clusters (SCs) and ESBL gene subtypes and the degree of similarity using Czekanowski's proportional similarity index (PSI). RESULTS: Nine out of 10 most prevalent STs and SCs and 8/10 most prevalent ESBL genes in clinical ESBL-Ec were also the most common types in community faeces. The proportions of ST131 (39% versus 23%) and SC131 (40% versus 25%) were higher in clinical isolates than in community faeces (P < 0.01). Within ST131, H30Rx (C2) subclade was more prevalent among clinical isolates (55% versus 26%, P < 0.01). The proportion of ESBL gene blaCTX-M-1 was lower in clinical isolates (5% versus 18%, P < 0.01). Czekanowski's PSI confirmed that the differences in ESBL-Ec from community faeces and clinical isolates were limited. CONCLUSIONS: Distributions of the 10 most prevalent clones and ESBL genes from ESBL-Ec community gut colonization and extra-intestinal infection overlapped in majority, indicating that isolates from routine clinical practice could be used to monitor ESBL-Ec clones and ESBL genes in the community.