Risk of neoplastic progression in Barrett's esophagus diagnosed as indefinite for dysplasia: A nationwide cohort study

Background and study aims: A histological diagnosis of indefinite for dysplasia (IND) in Barrett's esophagus is used when a diagnosis of genuine dysplasia is equivocal. The aim of the present study was to assess the risk of progression to high grade dysplasia (HGD) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) after a diagnosis of IND in a nationwide cohort of patients with Barrett's esophagus. Patients and methods: Patients with a first diagnosis of IND in Barrett's esophagus between 2002 and 2011 were selected from a nationwide registry of histopathology diagnoses in The Netherlands. Patients were foll... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Kestens, Christine
Leenders, Max
Offerhaus, G. Johan A
Van Baal, Jantine W P M
Siersema, Peter D.
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2015
Schlagwörter: LOW-GRADE DYSPLASIA / GASTROINTESTINAL EPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA / CRYPT DYSPLASIA / ADENOCARCINOMA / NETHERLANDS / REPRODUCIBILITY / SURVEILLANCE / VARIABILITY / BIOMARKERS / MANAGEMENT / Gastroenterology
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29201609
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/331404

Background and study aims: A histological diagnosis of indefinite for dysplasia (IND) in Barrett's esophagus is used when a diagnosis of genuine dysplasia is equivocal. The aim of the present study was to assess the risk of progression to high grade dysplasia (HGD) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) after a diagnosis of IND in a nationwide cohort of patients with Barrett's esophagus. Patients and methods: Patients with a first diagnosis of IND in Barrett's esophagus between 2002 and 2011 were selected from a nationwide registry of histopathology diagnoses in The Netherlands. Patients were followed up until treatment for HGD, detection of EAC, or date of last endoscopy contact with biopsy sampling. Results: In total, 1258 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 842 (66.9%) underwent endoscopic follow-up. Patients were followed for a total of 2585 person-years (mean ± SD 3.01 ± 2.6). Median duration until first follow-up endoscopy was 1.2 years (interquartile range 0.3a-1.8 years). The progression rate from IND to the combined end point of HGD or EAC was 2.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-2.6) per 100 person-years and progression to EAC was 1.2 (95%CI 0.8-1.6). After excluding cases with HGD or EAC within 1 year after IND diagnosis (na=16), the progression rates were 1.4 (95%CI 1.01.9) and 0.8 (95%CI 0.5-1.2) per 100 person-years for HGD or EAC and EAC, respectively. Conclusion: In this large, population-based, cohort of patients with Barrett's esophagus, the incidence rate of HGD or EAC following a diagnosis of IND was 1.4 per 100 person-years. The results demonstrate the need for additional studies to select the subgroup of IND patients with an increased risk of neoplastic progression.