Cost-effectiveness of Cardiac Telerehabilitation With Relapse Prevention for the Treatment of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease in the Netherlands

Importance: Cardiac telerehabilitation (CTR) has been found to be a safe and beneficial alternative to traditional center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and might be associated with higher participation rates by reducing barriers to CR use. However, implementation of CTR interventions remains low, which may be owing to a lack of cost-effectiveness analyses of data from large-scale randomized clinical trials. Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of CTR with relapse prevention compared with center-based CR among patients with coronary artery disease. Design, Setting, and Participants:... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Brouwers, Rutger W.M.
van der Poort, Esmée K.J.
Kemps, Hareld M.C.
van den Akker-van Marle, M. Elske
Kraal, Jos J.
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2021
Reihe/Periodikum: Brouwers , R W M , van der Poort , E K J , Kemps , H M C , van den Akker-van Marle , M E & Kraal , J J 2021 , ' Cost-effectiveness of Cardiac Telerehabilitation With Relapse Prevention for the Treatment of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease in the Netherlands ' , JAMA Network Open , vol. 4 , no. 12 , e2136652 . https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.36652
Schlagwörter: Aged / Cardiac Rehabilitation/economics / Coronary Artery Disease/economics / Cost-Benefit Analysis / Female / Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data / Humans / Male / Middle Aged / Netherlands / Quality-Adjusted Life Years / Secondary Prevention/economics / Telerehabilitation/economics / Treatment Outcome
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29195879
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://research.tue.nl/en/publications/8791f634-c819-4b55-bad1-d3babfdb9a09

Importance: Cardiac telerehabilitation (CTR) has been found to be a safe and beneficial alternative to traditional center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and might be associated with higher participation rates by reducing barriers to CR use. However, implementation of CTR interventions remains low, which may be owing to a lack of cost-effectiveness analyses of data from large-scale randomized clinical trials. Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of CTR with relapse prevention compared with center-based CR among patients with coronary artery disease. Design, Setting, and Participants: This economic evaluation performed a cost-utility analysis of data from the SmartCare-CAD (Effects of Cardiac Telerehabilitation in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Using a Personalized Patient-Centred ICT Platform) randomized clinical trial. The cost-effectiveness and utility of 3 months of cardiac telerehabilitation followed by 9 months of relapse prevention were compared with the cost-effectiveness of traditional center-based cardiac rehabilitation. The analysis included 300 patients with stable coronary artery disease who received care at a CR center serving 2 general hospitals in the Netherlands between May 23, 2016, and July 26, 2018. All patients were entering phase 2 of outpatient CR and were followed up for 1 year (until August 14, 2019). Data were analyzed from September 21, 2020, to September 24, 2021. Intervention: After baseline measurements were obtained, participants were randomly assigned on a 1:1 ratio to receive CTR (intervention group) or center-based CR (control group) using computerized block randomization. After 6 supervised center-based training sessions, patients in the intervention group continued training at home using a heart rate monitor and accelerometer. Patients uploaded heart rate and physical activity data and discussed their progress during a weekly video consultation with their physical therapist. After 3 months, weekly coaching was concluded, and on-demand coaching was initiated for ...