Cognitive and affective outcomes of genetic counselling in the Netherlands at group and individual level:a personalized approach seems necessary

We performed a large outcome study at group and individual level in which the goals of genetic counselling were operationalized into cognitive and affective outcomes: empowerment, perceived personal control and anxiety. We then examined which socio-demographic and clinical variables were associated with changes in these outcomes. Data came from 1479 counselees who completed questionnaires (GCOS-18, PPC and STAI) at three time points: before the start of genetic counselling, after the first consultation and after the results of genetic counselling were disclosed. Results showed that at group le... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Voorwinden, Jan S
Plantinga, Mirjam
Ausems, Margreet
Knoers, Nine
Velthuizen, Mary
Birnie, Erwin
Lucassen, Anneke M
Ranchor, Adelita V
van Langen, Irene M
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2020
Reihe/Periodikum: Voorwinden , J S , Plantinga , M , Ausems , M , Knoers , N , Velthuizen , M , Birnie , E , Lucassen , A M , Ranchor , A V & van Langen , I M 2020 , ' Cognitive and affective outcomes of genetic counselling in the Netherlands at group and individual level : a personalized approach seems necessary ' , EJHG , vol. 28 , no. 9 , pp. 1187-1195 . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-020-0629-5
Schlagwörter: PSYCHOSOCIAL PROBLEMS / PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACT / CANCER / BREAST / GOALS
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29192530
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://hdl.handle.net/11370/d78d63a5-4765-41c0-8349-1732c0b7b1fd

We performed a large outcome study at group and individual level in which the goals of genetic counselling were operationalized into cognitive and affective outcomes: empowerment, perceived personal control and anxiety. We then examined which socio-demographic and clinical variables were associated with changes in these outcomes. Data came from 1479 counselees who completed questionnaires (GCOS-18, PPC and STAI) at three time points: before the start of genetic counselling, after the first consultation and after the results of genetic counselling were disclosed. Results showed that at group level empowerment, perceived personal control and anxiety improved significantly after the whole genetic counselling process. Effect-sizes were medium for empowerment and small for the other outcomes. At individual level, 48% of counselees improved in empowerment, 21% in perceived personal control and 17% in anxiety. Around 10% of counselees worsened on all outcomes. Only 'reason for referral' and 'genetic test result' were significantly associated with changes in outcomes. This study demonstrated improvements among counselees in cognitive and affective outcomes after genetic counselling at group level. However, our results also suggest that there are opportunities for improvement at individual level, as many counselees remained stable and some even worsened on all outcomes. Routine outcome monitoring could help to explore the needs of counselees and could help to identify counselees who worsen.