Trust in Centralized Large-Scale Data Repository:A Qualitative Analysis

Exponential increases in digital data and calls for participation in human research raise questions about when and why individuals voluntarily provide personal data. We conducted 36 in-depth interviews with ex-participants, participants, and nonparticipants in a biobank to identify key factors influencing trust in centralized large-scale data repository for human research. Our findings indicated that trust depends strongly on whether such data repository benefits the public, the interests of data collectors, the characteristics of the collected data, and application of informed consent for ret... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Broekstra, Reinder
Aris-Meijer, Judith
Maeckelberghe, Els
Stolk, Ronald
Otten, Sabine
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2020
Reihe/Periodikum: Broekstra , R , Aris-Meijer , J , Maeckelberghe , E , Stolk , R & Otten , S 2020 , ' Trust in Centralized Large-Scale Data Repository : A Qualitative Analysis ' , Journal of empirical research on human research ethics , vol. 15 , no. 4 , pp. 365-378 . https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619888365
Schlagwörter: trust / big data / biorepositories / biobanks / cohort study / decision making / qualitative methods / the Netherlands / justice / participant selection / inclusion / recruitment / INFORMED-CONSENT / BIOBANK RESEARCH / PARTICIPANTS / HEALTH / COMMERCIALIZATION / PERCEPTIONS / INTENTION / DISTRUST / DECISION / COHORT
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29192301
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://hdl.handle.net/11370/c1baf32c-58bd-4aac-8cad-1506371634f7

Exponential increases in digital data and calls for participation in human research raise questions about when and why individuals voluntarily provide personal data. We conducted 36 in-depth interviews with ex-participants, participants, and nonparticipants in a biobank to identify key factors influencing trust in centralized large-scale data repository for human research. Our findings indicated that trust depends strongly on whether such data repository benefits the public, the interests of data collectors, the characteristics of the collected data, and application of informed consent for retaining control over personal data. Concerns about the aims and range of data repository appeared to influence withdrawal of participation. Our findings underscore ethical and practical issues relating to data collection and consent procedures in human research.