Trust in Centralized Large-Scale Data Repository:A Qualitative Analysis
Exponential increases in digital data and calls for participation in human research raise questions about when and why individuals voluntarily provide personal data. We conducted 36 in-depth interviews with ex-participants, participants, and nonparticipants in a biobank to identify key factors influencing trust in centralized large-scale data repository for human research. Our findings indicated that trust depends strongly on whether such data repository benefits the public, the interests of data collectors, the characteristics of the collected data, and application of informed consent for ret... Mehr ...
Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Dokumenttyp: | Artikel |
Erscheinungsdatum: | 2020 |
Reihe/Periodikum: | Broekstra , R , Aris-Meijer , J , Maeckelberghe , E , Stolk , R & Otten , S 2020 , ' Trust in Centralized Large-Scale Data Repository : A Qualitative Analysis ' , Journal of empirical research on human research ethics , vol. 15 , no. 4 , pp. 365-378 . https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619888365 |
Schlagwörter: | trust / big data / biorepositories / biobanks / cohort study / decision making / qualitative methods / the Netherlands / justice / participant selection / inclusion / recruitment / INFORMED-CONSENT / BIOBANK RESEARCH / PARTICIPANTS / HEALTH / COMMERCIALIZATION / PERCEPTIONS / INTENTION / DISTRUST / DECISION / COHORT |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Permalink: | https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29192301 |
Datenquelle: | BASE; Originalkatalog |
Powered By: | BASE |
Link(s) : | https://hdl.handle.net/11370/c1baf32c-58bd-4aac-8cad-1506371634f7 |
Exponential increases in digital data and calls for participation in human research raise questions about when and why individuals voluntarily provide personal data. We conducted 36 in-depth interviews with ex-participants, participants, and nonparticipants in a biobank to identify key factors influencing trust in centralized large-scale data repository for human research. Our findings indicated that trust depends strongly on whether such data repository benefits the public, the interests of data collectors, the characteristics of the collected data, and application of informed consent for retaining control over personal data. Concerns about the aims and range of data repository appeared to influence withdrawal of participation. Our findings underscore ethical and practical issues relating to data collection and consent procedures in human research.