Effectiveness of A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza vaccine in adults recommended for annual influenza vaccination

INTRODUCTION: Because of variability in published A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza vaccine effectiveness estimates, we conducted a study in the adults belonging to the risk groups to assess the A(H1N1)pdm09 MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccine effectiveness. METHODS: VE against influenza and/or pneumonia was assessed in the cohort study (n>25000), and vaccine effectiveness against laboratory-confirmed A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza was assessed in a matched case-control study (16 pairs). Odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated by using multivariate logistic regression; vacci... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Gefenaite, Giedre
Tacken, Margot
Bos, Jens
Stirbu-Wagner, Irina
Korevaar, Joke C.
Stolk, Ronald P.
Wolters, Bert
Bijl, Marc
Postma, Maarten J.
Wilschut, Jan
Nichol, Kristin L.
Hak, Eelko
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2013
Reihe/Periodikum: Gefenaite , G , Tacken , M , Bos , J , Stirbu-Wagner , I , Korevaar , J C , Stolk , R P , Wolters , B , Bijl , M , Postma , M J , Wilschut , J , Nichol , K L & Hak , E 2013 , ' Effectiveness of A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza vaccine in adults recommended for annual influenza vaccination ' , PLoS ONE , vol. 8 , no. 6 , e66125 . https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066125
Schlagwörter: Adjuvants / Immunologic / Adolescent / Adult / Case-Control Studies / Female / Humans / Influenza A Virus / H1N1 Subtype / Influenza Vaccines / Influenza / Human / Male / Middle Aged / Netherlands / Polysorbates / Retrospective Studies / Squalene / Vaccination / Young Adult
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29191710
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://hdl.handle.net/11370/93863b5a-34bc-4347-b5ed-966232153d6b

INTRODUCTION: Because of variability in published A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza vaccine effectiveness estimates, we conducted a study in the adults belonging to the risk groups to assess the A(H1N1)pdm09 MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccine effectiveness. METHODS: VE against influenza and/or pneumonia was assessed in the cohort study (n>25000), and vaccine effectiveness against laboratory-confirmed A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza was assessed in a matched case-control study (16 pairs). Odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated by using multivariate logistic regression; vaccine effectiveness was estimated as (1-odds ratio)*100%. RESULTS: Vaccine effectiveness against laboratory-confirmed A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza and influenza and/or pneumonia was 98% (84-100%) and 33% (2-54%) respectively. The vaccine did not prevent influenza and/or pneumonia in 18-59 years old subjects, and was 49% (16-69%) effective in 60 years and older subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Even though we cannot entirely rule out that selection bias, residual confounding and/or cross-protection has played a role, the present results indicate that the MF59-adjuvanted A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza vaccine has been effective in preventing laboratory-confirmed A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza and influenza and/or pneumonia, the latter notably in 60 years and older subjects.