Contingency analysis on whether threatened status and origin affect the preferred NLC, NLC-F and NLC-O.

a1-a3 , Differences of preferred NLC within groups of threatened status, rarity and origin. b1-b3 , Differences of preferred NLC-F within groups of threatened status, rarity and origin. c1-c3 , Differences of preferred NLC-O within groups of threatened status, rarity and origin. Preferred NLC, NLC-F and NLC-O mean the preferences for natural land cover (preferred NLC), the cover of natural forest area (preferred NLC-F) and the cover for natural open area (preferred NLC-O). (DOCX)

Verfasser: Kaixuan Pan (11714457)
Merijn Moens (11714460)
Leon Marshall (11714463)
Ellen Cieraad (6471002)
Geert R. de Snoo (11714466)
Koos Biesmeijer (752575)
Dokumenttyp: Text
Erscheinungsdatum: 2021
Schlagwörter: Evolutionary Biology / Ecology / Sociology / Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified / Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified / natural open area / species distribution models / different species groups / 1 km resolution / intensity land cover / preferred extremely high / netherlands </ p / also informs improvements / 0 &# 8211 / natural land cover / 1 122 native / natural forest area / open areas rather / species occurrence probability / native species / natural areas / completely open / occurrence probability / rare species / common species / low cover / either cover / threatened species / species conservation / xlink \ / > / results stress / remains unclear / nationwide study / linear increase / forested nature / conserving purposes / automatically result
Sprache: unknown
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29184723
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259255.s014