Routinely collected general practice data: goldmines for research? A report of the European Federation for Medical Informatics Primary Care Informatics Working Group (EFMI PCIWG) from MIE2006, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Background Much of European primary care is computerised and many groups of practices pool data for research. Technology is making pooled general practice data widely available beyond the domain within which it is collected. Objective To explore the barriers and opportunities to exploiting routinely collected general practice data for research. Method Workshop, led by primary care and informatics academics experienced at working with clinical data from large databases, involving 23 delegates from eight countries. Email comments about the write-up from participants. Outputs The components of an... Mehr ...

Verfasser: de Lusignan, Simon
Metsemakers, Job
Houwink, Pieter
Gunnarsdottir, Valgerdur
VanDerLei, Johan
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2006
Verlag/Hrsg.: BCS Learning and Development
Schlagwörter: clinical records / general practice data / primary care informatics
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29177839
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : http://hijournal.bcs.org/index.php/jhi/article/view/632

Background Much of European primary care is computerised and many groups of practices pool data for research. Technology is making pooled general practice data widely available beyond the domain within which it is collected. Objective To explore the barriers and opportunities to exploiting routinely collected general practice data for research. Method Workshop, led by primary care and informatics academics experienced at working with clinical data from large databases, involving 23 delegates from eight countries. Email comments about the write-up from participants. Outputs The components of an effective process are: the input of those who have a detailed understanding of the context in which the data were recordedan assessment of the validity of these data and any denominator usedcreation of anonymised unique identifiers for each patient which can be decoded within the contributing practicesdata must be traceable back to the patient record from which it was extractedarchiving of the queries, the look-up tables of any coding systems used and the ethical constraints which govern the use of the data. Conclusions Explicit statements are needed to explain the source, context of recording, validity check and processing method of any routinely collected data used in research. Data lacking detailed methodological descriptors should not be published.