Abstract Since 2019, the Dutch Public Prosecutor has tried four cases in which the accused has been cumulatively charged with a terrorism-related crime as well as a core international crime. This article examines the Dutch selection and prioritisation process of these charges when they are combined, comparing it to cases that solely include a core international crime charge and solely include terrorism-related charges. The findings suggest that, as a result of the suspect-driven approach and limited universal jurisdiction in the Netherlands, the available evidence is the most important criterion in the selection and prioritisation process in cases that include core international crimes. Moreover, resources can also be identified as an influential factor, whereas this aspect features less prominently in cases that only include terrorism-related charges. The influence of other criteria, such as gravity, remains ambiguous.