Value-based healthcare implementation in the Netherlands: a quantitative analysis of multidisciplinary team performance ...

Abstract Background Many hospitals worldwide have set up multidisciplinary Value Improvement (VI) teams that use the Value-Based Health Care (VBHC) theory to improve patient value. However, it remains unclear what the level of VBHC implementation is within these teams. We therefore studied the current level of VBHC implementation in VI teams. Methods A questionnaire was developed based on the strategic agenda for value transformation and real-world experiences with VBHC implementation. The questionnaire consisted of 21 questions, mapped to seven domains, and was sent out to 25 multidisciplinar... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Westerink, Henrike J.
Steinmann, Gijs
Koomans, Maarten
van der Kemp, Michèle H.
van der Nat, Paul B.
Dokumenttyp: Datenquelle
Erscheinungsdatum: 2024
Verlag/Hrsg.: figshare
Schlagwörter: Space Science / Medicine / Biotechnology / Immunology / FOS: Clinical medicine / Science Policy
Sprache: unknown
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29167730
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.7086384

Abstract Background Many hospitals worldwide have set up multidisciplinary Value Improvement (VI) teams that use the Value-Based Health Care (VBHC) theory to improve patient value. However, it remains unclear what the level of VBHC implementation is within these teams. We therefore studied the current level of VBHC implementation in VI teams. Methods A questionnaire was developed based on the strategic agenda for value transformation and real-world experiences with VBHC implementation. The questionnaire consisted of 21 questions, mapped to seven domains, and was sent out to 25 multidisciplinary VI teams. Median scores for individual questions (scale = 1–5) and average scores per domain were calculated. Results One hundred forty VI team members completed the questionnaire. The overall average score is 3.49. The ‘culture and responsibility’ domain obtained the highest average score (µ = 4.11). The domain ‘measure and improve outcomes’ and the domain ‘multidisciplinary team’ obtained average scores that are ...