The updated national research agenda 2021–2026 for prehospital emergency medical services in the Netherlands: a Delphi study ...

Abstract Background In 2015, a national research agenda was established for Dutch prehospital EMS to underpin the evidence base of care delivery and inform policymakers and funders. The continuously increasing demand for ambulance care and the reorientation towards the role of EMS in recent years may have changed research priorities. Therefore, this study aimed to update the Dutch national EMS research agenda. Methods A three-round online Delphi survey was used to explore and discuss different viewpoints and to reach consensus on research priorities (i.e., themes and special interest groups, e... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Vloet, Lilian C. M.
Hesselink, Gijs
Berben, Sivera A. A.
Hoogeveen, Margreet
Rood, Paul J. T.
Ebben, Remco H. A.
Dokumenttyp: Datenquelle
Erscheinungsdatum: 2021
Verlag/Hrsg.: figshare
Schlagwörter: Biochemistry / Medicine / Biotechnology / Science Policy / 110309 Infectious Diseases / FOS: Health sciences
Sprache: unknown
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29167533
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5716952

Abstract Background In 2015, a national research agenda was established for Dutch prehospital EMS to underpin the evidence base of care delivery and inform policymakers and funders. The continuously increasing demand for ambulance care and the reorientation towards the role of EMS in recent years may have changed research priorities. Therefore, this study aimed to update the Dutch national EMS research agenda. Methods A three-round online Delphi survey was used to explore and discuss different viewpoints and to reach consensus on research priorities (i.e., themes and special interest groups, e.g. patient types who require specific research attention). A multidisciplinary expert panel (n = 62) was recruited in the field of prehospital EMS and delegates of relevant professional organizations and stakeholders participated. In round one, fifty-nine research themes and six special interest groups (derived from several resources) were rated on importance on a 5-point scale by the panel members. In round two, the ...