Additional file 1: of Facilitating validation of prediction models: a comparison of manual and semi-automated validation using registry-based data of breast cancer patients in the Netherlands ...
Graphical representation of the validation studies executed by semi-automated and manual validation. The file consists of four supplementary figures. Figure S1. represents the calibration and discrimination of CancerMathâ s prediction tool for 5-year overall survival, executed by both validation methods. Figure S2. shows the calibration and discrimination of the INFLUENCE prediction tool for the 5-year risk on a locoregional recurrence, executed by both validation methods. Figure S3. shows the calibration and discrimination of the PPAM prediction tool for the risk on axillary lymph node metast... Mehr ...
| Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Dokumenttyp: | Journal contribution |
| Erscheinungsdatum: | 2019 |
| Verlag/Hrsg.: |
figshare
|
| Schlagwörter: | Space Science / Medicine / 39999 Chemical Sciences not elsewhere classified / FOS: Chemical sciences / Sociology / FOS: Sociology / 69999 Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified / FOS: Biological sciences / 80699 Information Systems not elsewhere classified / FOS: Computer and information sciences / 19999 Mathematical Sciences not elsewhere classified / FOS: Mathematics / Marine Biology / Plant Biology |
| Sprache: | unknown |
| Permalink: | https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29167023 |
| Datenquelle: | BASE; Originalkatalog |
| Powered By: | BASE |
| Link(s) : | https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.8246609.v1 |
Graphical representation of the validation studies executed by semi-automated and manual validation. The file consists of four supplementary figures. Figure S1. represents the calibration and discrimination of CancerMathâ s prediction tool for 5-year overall survival, executed by both validation methods. Figure S2. shows the calibration and discrimination of the INFLUENCE prediction tool for the 5-year risk on a locoregional recurrence, executed by both validation methods. Figure S3. shows the calibration and discrimination of the PPAM prediction tool for the risk on axillary lymph node metastasis for both validation methods. Figure S4.s shows the calibration and discrimination of PREDICTâ s prediction tool for 5-year overall survival, for both types of validation. (PDF 744 kb) ...