La refondation architecturale de la Cour de justice européenne à Luxembourg

The European Court of Justice is in Luxembourg since 1973, in a group of buildings constructed and transformed little by little over the last 50 years. At the heart of what has become an urban complex, stands the original courthouse, the work of architects Jean-Paul Conzemius, François Jamagne and Michel Van der Elst. In 2008, the architect Dominique Perrault restructured the palace and extended it by enveloping it with an “architectural ring”. This article presents, firstly, the original structure, a unique example of metallic architecture from the end of the 20th century by explaining the pr... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Lorenzo Diez
Dominique Perrault
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Reihe/Periodikum: In Situ, Vol 49
Verlag/Hrsg.: Ministère de la Culture et de la Communication
Schlagwörter: heritage / Leon Battista Alberti / Luxembourg / metallic architecture / architectural theory / conservation and restoration / Fine Arts / N
Sprache: Französisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29104449
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://doi.org/10.4000/insitu.37149

The European Court of Justice is in Luxembourg since 1973, in a group of buildings constructed and transformed little by little over the last 50 years. At the heart of what has become an urban complex, stands the original courthouse, the work of architects Jean-Paul Conzemius, François Jamagne and Michel Van der Elst. In 2008, the architect Dominique Perrault restructured the palace and extended it by enveloping it with an “architectural ring”. This article presents, firstly, the original structure, a unique example of metallic architecture from the end of the 20th century by explaining the principles of its composition and its construction, its spatialities and its materialities as well as its symbolic qualities. It then proposes a reflection upon the 2008 intervention and the ring that led to a redesign of the palace’s architecture. Finally, it shines a light on the promising innovation introduced by its label as “Outstanding Contemporary Architecture”, namely the possibility, through the label’s sliding 100-year period, of superimposing the theories and practices of architectural creation and conservation.