eDNA-based monitoring of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis and Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans with ddPCR in Luxembourg ponds: taking signals below the Limit of Detection (LOD) into account

Abstract Background Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) and Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans (Bsal) are two pathogenic fungi that are a significant threat to amphibian communities worldwide. European populations are strongly impacted and the monitoring of the presence and spread of these pathogens is crucial for efficient decision-making in conservation management. Results Here we proposed an environmental DNA (eDNA) monitoring of these two pathogenic agents through droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) based on water samples from 24 ponds in Luxembourg. In addition, amphibians were swabbed in eight of... Mehr ...

Verfasser: David Porco
Chanistya Ayu Purnomo
Liza Glesener
Roland Proess
Stéphanie Lippert
Kevin Jans
Guy Colling
Simone Schneider
Raf Stassen
Alain C. Frantz
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2024
Reihe/Periodikum: BMC Ecology and Evolution, Vol 24, Iss 1, Pp 1-16 (2024)
Verlag/Hrsg.: BMC
Schlagwörter: Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis / Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans / eDNA / Below-LOD signal / ddPCR / Pathogens / Ecology / QH540-549.5 / Evolution / QH359-425
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29104291
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-023-02189-9

Abstract Background Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) and Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans (Bsal) are two pathogenic fungi that are a significant threat to amphibian communities worldwide. European populations are strongly impacted and the monitoring of the presence and spread of these pathogens is crucial for efficient decision-making in conservation management. Results Here we proposed an environmental DNA (eDNA) monitoring of these two pathogenic agents through droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) based on water samples from 24 ponds in Luxembourg. In addition, amphibians were swabbed in eight of the targeted ponds in order to compare the two approaches at site-level detection. This study allowed the development of a new method taking below-Limit of Detection (LOD) results into account thanks to the statistical comparison of the frequencies of false positives in no template controls (NTC) and below-LOD results in technical replicates. In the eDNA-based approach, the use of this method led to an increase in Bd and Bsal detection of 28 and 50% respectively. In swabbing, this resulted in 8% more positive results for Bd. In some samples, the use of technical replicates allowed to recover above-LOD signals and increase Bd detection by 35 and 33% respectively for eDNA and swabbing, and Bsal detection by 25% for eDNA. Conclusions These results confirmed the usefulness of technical replicates to overcome high levels of stochasticity in very low concentration samples even for a highly sensitive technique such as ddPCR. In addition, it showed that below-LOD signals could be consistently recovered and the corresponding amplification events assigned either to positive or negative detection via the method developed here. This methodology might be particularly worth pursuing in pathogenic agents’ detection as false negatives could have important adverse consequences. In total, 15 ponds were found positive for Bd and four for Bsal. This study reports the first record of Bsal in Luxembourg.