Author Correction: Removal of deep-sea sponges by bottom trawling in the Flemish Cap area: conservation, ecology and economic assessment

Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52250-1 , published online 01 Novenber 2019 The original version of this Article contained errors in the Abstract. “Sponge biomass surfaces created from research survey data using both random forest modeling and a gridded surface revealed 231,140 t of sponges in the area. About 65% of that biomass was protected by current fisheries closures.” now reads: “Sponge biomass surface created from research survey data using random forest modeling revealed 231,136 t of sponges in the area. About 42% of that biomass was protected by cu... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Pham, CK
Murillo, FJ
Lirette, C
Maldonado, Manuel
Colaço, Ana
Ottaviani, D
Kenchington, Ellen
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2020
Verlag/Hrsg.: Zenodo
Schlagwörter: Flemish Cap / trawling / conservation / economics / random forest modeling / deep-sea / European Union / Horizon 2020 / Deep-sea Sponge Grounds Ecosystems of the North Atlantic: An integrated approach towards their preservation and sustainable exploitation / SponGES / Grant Agreement No 679849
Sprache: unknown
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29067008
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60908-4

Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52250-1 , published online 01 Novenber 2019 The original version of this Article contained errors in the Abstract. “Sponge biomass surfaces created from research survey data using both random forest modeling and a gridded surface revealed 231,140 t of sponges in the area. About 65% of that biomass was protected by current fisheries closures.” now reads: “Sponge biomass surface created from research survey data using random forest modeling revealed 231,136 t of sponges in the area. About 42% of that biomass was protected by current fisheries closures.” This error has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.