The temporal interpretation of West Flemish non-inverted V3
This chapter compares the temporal interpretation of the initial adjuncts in a regular V2 pattern, in which the finite verb has inverted with the subject, and in the West Flemish V3 patterns in which an adjunct precedes a non-inverted V2 pattern. In the periphrastic tenses, a difference in interpretation emerges. In the regular V2 pattern, an initial time adjunct modifies either Reference Time or Event Time of the associated clause. In the non-inverted V3 pattern, the initial temporal clause can only modify matrix Reference Time. This restriction is shown to follow from the analysis elaborated... Mehr ...
Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Dokumenttyp: | bookChapter |
Erscheinungsdatum: | 2019 |
Verlag/Hrsg.: |
Aarhus University
|
Schlagwörter: | Languages and Literatures / Verb Second / V2 transgressions / temporal interpretation / Reference Time / Event time |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Permalink: | https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29066122 |
Datenquelle: | BASE; Originalkatalog |
Powered By: | BASE |
Link(s) : | https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/8639920 |
This chapter compares the temporal interpretation of the initial adjuncts in a regular V2 pattern, in which the finite verb has inverted with the subject, and in the West Flemish V3 patterns in which an adjunct precedes a non-inverted V2 pattern. In the periphrastic tenses, a difference in interpretation emerges. In the regular V2 pattern, an initial time adjunct modifies either Reference Time or Event Time of the associated clause. In the non-inverted V3 pattern, the initial temporal clause can only modify matrix Reference Time. This restriction is shown to follow from the analysis elaborated in Haegeman and Greco (2018a,b) combined with a split Tense proposal in which Reference time and Event time are located on distinct functional heads.