Correction to:Re-evaluation of the Dutch approach: are recently referred transgender youth different compared to earlier referrals? (European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, (2020), 29, 6, (803-811), 10.1007/s00787-019-01394-6)

The original version of this article inadvertently contained the wrong version of Fig. 4 and the descriptives derived from it. Please, see the correct version of Fig. 4 and the descriptives below. The mean percentage per year of diagnosed adolescents that started with affirmative medical treatment (puberty suppression and/or gender-affirming hormones) is 90.6%, the range is 70%–100%. This inaccuracy has no further impact on the article because the correct percentages were used in all analyses. The answer to one of the research questions: ’Has the number of GD diagnosed adolescents who continue... Mehr ...

Volltext
Verfasser: Arnoldussen, Marijn
Steensma, Thomas D.
Popma, Arne
van der Miesen, Anna I.R.
Twisk, Jos W.R.
de Vries, Annelou L.C.
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2020
Reihe/Periodikum: Arnoldussen , M , Steensma , T D , Popma , A , van der Miesen , A I R , Twisk , J W R & de Vries , A L C 2020 , ' Correction to : Re-evaluation of the Dutch approach: are recently referred transgender youth different compared to earlier referrals? (European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, (2020), 29, 6, (803-811), 10.1007/s00787-019-01394-6) ' , European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-020-01691-5
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29048432
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://research.vumc.nl/en/publications/f6a84424-7498-4a0c-b691-763cdb568a24

The original version of this article inadvertently contained the wrong version of Fig. 4 and the descriptives derived from it. Please, see the correct version of Fig. 4 and the descriptives below. The mean percentage per year of diagnosed adolescents that started with affirmative medical treatment (puberty suppression and/or gender-affirming hormones) is 90.6%, the range is 70%–100%. This inaccuracy has no further impact on the article because the correct percentages were used in all analyses. The answer to one of the research questions: ’Has the number of GD diagnosed adolescents who continue with medical treatment changed over time?’ is therefore still correct. (Figure presented).