Collective constructions of 'waste':epistemic practices for disinvestment in the context of Dutch social health insurance

BACKGROUND: Faced with growing budget pressure, policymakers worldwide recognize the necessity of strategic disinvestment from ineffective, inefficient or harmful medical practices. However, disinvestment programs face substantial social, political and cultural challenges: mistrust, struggles for clinical autonomy or stakeholders' reluctance to engage in what can be perceived as 'rationing'. Academic literature says little about effective strategies to address these challenges. This paper provides insights on this matter. We analyzed the epistemic work of a group of policymakers at the Nationa... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Moes, Floortje
Houwaart, Eddy
Delnoij, Diana
Horstman, Klasien
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2019
Reihe/Periodikum: Moes , F , Houwaart , E , Delnoij , D & Horstman , K 2019 , ' Collective constructions of 'waste' : epistemic practices for disinvestment in the context of Dutch social health insurance ' , BMC Health Services Research , vol. 19 , no. 1 , 633 , pp. 633 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4434-1
Schlagwörter: /dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/good_health_and_well_being / SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29043789
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://pure.eur.nl/en/publications/53444452-ca5e-43be-b67c-8288201fa772

BACKGROUND: Faced with growing budget pressure, policymakers worldwide recognize the necessity of strategic disinvestment from ineffective, inefficient or harmful medical practices. However, disinvestment programs face substantial social, political and cultural challenges: mistrust, struggles for clinical autonomy or stakeholders' reluctance to engage in what can be perceived as 'rationing'. Academic literature says little about effective strategies to address these challenges. This paper provides insights on this matter. We analyzed the epistemic work of a group of policymakers at the National Health Care Institute on what was initially a disinvestment initiative within the context of the Dutch basic benefits package: the 'Appropriate Care' program. The Institute developed a strategy using national administrative data to identify and tackle low-value care covered from public funds as well as potential underuse, and achieve savings through improved organization of efficiency and quality in health care delivery. How did the Institute deal with the socio-political sensitivities associated with disinvestment by means of their epistemic work? METHOD: We conducted ethnographic research into the National Health Care Institute's epistemic practices. Research entailed document analysis, non-participant observation, in-depth conversations, and interviews with key-informants. RESULTS: The Institute dealt with the socio-political sensitivities associated with disinvestment by democratizing the epistemic practices to identify low-value care, by warranting data analysis by clinical experts, by creating an epistemic safe space for health care professionals who were the object of research into low-value care, and by de-emphasizing the economization measure. Ultimately, this epistemic work facilitated a collaborative construction of problems relating to low-value care practices and their solutions. CONCLUSIONS: This case shows that - apart from the right data and adequate expertise - disinvestment requires clinical leadership ...