Bilateral hereditary micro-epiphyseal dysplasia : clinical and genetic analysis of a Dutch family

This thesis is based upon a study of a Dutch family with a unique skeletal dysplasia first described by Elsbach in 1959. Because of the presence of microepiphyses, he called this disorder bilateral hereditary micro-epiphyseal dysplasia (BHMED) and distinguished it from more common multiple epiphyseal dysplasia (MED). Clinical features were early onset of bilateral symmetric synchronic complaints of pain in hip and knee, and radiographically small epiphyses of the hip joint. Although Elsbach regarded this disorder as different from common multiple epiphyseal dysplasia, others suggested that it... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Mostert, Adrianus Klazinus
Dokumenttyp: Dissertation
Erscheinungsdatum: 2003
Schlagwörter: Geneeskunde / skeletal dysplasia / multiple epiphyseal dysplasia / matrilin-3 / hereditary / linkage analysis / mutation analysis / metacarpophalangeal pattern / osteoarthritis / autosomal dominant
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29040527
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/484

This thesis is based upon a study of a Dutch family with a unique skeletal dysplasia first described by Elsbach in 1959. Because of the presence of microepiphyses, he called this disorder bilateral hereditary micro-epiphyseal dysplasia (BHMED) and distinguished it from more common multiple epiphyseal dysplasia (MED). Clinical features were early onset of bilateral symmetric synchronic complaints of pain in hip and knee, and radiographically small epiphyses of the hip joint. Although Elsbach regarded this disorder as different from common multiple epiphyseal dysplasia, others suggested that it was only a variant of common MED. Recent advances in molecular genetics allow for solving this etiological question of lumping versus splitting of entities by molecular genetic identification of the basic gene defects. Furthermore, the original family requested genetic counselling and wanted be informed about the genetic risks to the offspring and to obtain more information about the nature of the disease, which would clearly benefit from resolving the genetic defect underlying the skeletal disorder in their family. The aim of the study was to obtain answers to four main questions: 1.Is BHMED indeed a separate clinical entity among the MEDs? 2.What are the diagnostic radiographic features of BHMED? 3.What is the molecular genetic basis of BHMED? 4.What is the diagnostic value of metacarpophalangeal pattern (MCPP) profile analysis? The study included the original family including 40 years follow-up period, as well as new family members born since the first report by Elsbach. The clinical and radiological findings confirmed Elsbach’s conclusion that the disease in this family, designated by him as BHMED, indeed represents a separate entity that can be differentiated from common MED. Short stature was not only observed in affected patients, but also though to a lesser degree in their healthy siblings and the unaffected parents, which was explained by height-related partner choice consistently over several generations. Through ...