The word frequency effect in first- and second-language reading by Chinese and Dutch bilinguals

High-frequency words are processed faster than low-frequency words, known as the word frequency effect (FE). Although the FE has been studied in various writing systems as well as in first- (L1) and second-language (L2) reading, existing theoretical hypotheses are mainly based on findings in alphabetic languages. To date, no study has investigated theoretical explanations of the FE such as the learning hypothesis, the lexical entrenchment hypothesis and the rank hypothesis apply to Chinese-English bilinguals. The present study, therefore, compared the FEs in Chinese- and Dutch-English bilingua... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Sui, Longjiao
Woumans, Evy
Duyck, Wouter
Dirix, Nicolas
Dokumenttyp: journalarticle
Erscheinungsdatum: 2024
Schlagwörter: Languages and Literatures / frequency effects / reading / bilingualism / eye-movements / cross-linguistic comparison / LEXICAL DECISION DATA / CHARACTER FREQUENCY / VISUAL COMPLEXITY / RECOGNITION / PROJECT / ENTRENCHMENT / PREDICTABILITY / ACTIVATION / READERS
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29033096
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/01HX0Y1RCA3SYX219PDJ4H29X6

High-frequency words are processed faster than low-frequency words, known as the word frequency effect (FE). Although the FE has been studied in various writing systems as well as in first- (L1) and second-language (L2) reading, existing theoretical hypotheses are mainly based on findings in alphabetic languages. To date, no study has investigated theoretical explanations of the FE such as the learning hypothesis, the lexical entrenchment hypothesis and the rank hypothesis apply to Chinese-English bilinguals. The present study, therefore, compared the FEs in Chinese- and Dutch-English bilinguals during natural paragraph reading in their L1 and L2, using eye-tracking measures. Chinese bilinguals exhibited a larger FE in L2 than in L1. They displayed smaller L1 FEs and much steeper L2 FE curves than Dutch bilinguals. These findings are not entirely consistent with the existing FE hypotheses, and the present study discusses theoretical accounts in light of the observed results.