Ct-defined emphysema prevalence in a Chinese and Dutch general population
Purpose: We determine and compare the prevalence, subtypes, severity, and risk factors for emphysema assessed by low-dose CT(LDCT) in Chinese and Dutch general populations. Methods: This cross-sectional study included LDCT scans of 1143 participants between May and October 2017 from a Chinese Cohort study and 1200 participants with same age range and different smoking status between May and October 2019 from a Dutch population-based study. An experienced radiologist visually assessed the scans for emphysema presence (≥trace), subtype, and severity. Logistic regression analyses, overall and str... Mehr ...
Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Dokumenttyp: | Artikel |
Erscheinungsdatum: | 2024 |
Reihe/Periodikum: | Yang , X , Du , Y , Joost Wisselink , H , Zhao , Y , Heuvelmans , M A , J. M. Groen , H , Dorrius , M D , Vonder , M , Ye , Z , Vliegenthart , R & de Bock , G H 2024 , ' Ct-defined emphysema prevalence in a Chinese and Dutch general population ' , European Journal of Radiology , vol. 176 , 111503 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111503 |
Schlagwörter: | Asians / European / Prevalence / Pulmonary Emphysema / Tomography X-Ray Computed |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Permalink: | https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29028119 |
Datenquelle: | BASE; Originalkatalog |
Powered By: | BASE |
Link(s) : | https://hdl.handle.net/11370/7af7f593-5068-4a96-a9c5-dfbcb8f29c37 |
Purpose: We determine and compare the prevalence, subtypes, severity, and risk factors for emphysema assessed by low-dose CT(LDCT) in Chinese and Dutch general populations. Methods: This cross-sectional study included LDCT scans of 1143 participants between May and October 2017 from a Chinese Cohort study and 1200 participants with same age range and different smoking status between May and October 2019 from a Dutch population-based study. An experienced radiologist visually assessed the scans for emphysema presence (≥trace), subtype, and severity. Logistic regression analyses, overall and stratified by smoking status, were performed and adjusted for fume exposure, demographic and smoking data. Results: The Chinese population had a comparable proportion of women to the Dutch population (54.9 % vs 58.9 %), was older (61.7 ± 6.3 vs 59.8 ± 8.1), included more never smokers (66.4 % vs 38.3 %), had a higher emphysema prevalence ([58.8 % vs 39.7 %], adjusted odds ratio, aOR = 2.06, 95 %CI = 1.68–2.53), and more often had centrilobular emphysema (54.8 % vs 32.8 %, p < 0.001), but no differences in emphysema severity. After stratification, only in never smokers an increased odds of emphysema was observed in the Chinese compared to the Dutch (aOR = 2.55, 95 %CI = 1.95–3.35). Never smokers in both populations shared older age (aOR = 1.59, 95 %CI = 1.25–2.02 vs 1.26, 95 %CI = 0.97–1.64) and male sex (aOR = 1.50, 95 %CI = 1.02–2.22 vs 1.93, 95 %CI = 1.26–2.96) as risk factors for emphysema. Conclusions: Only never smokers had a higher prevalence of mainly centrilobular emphysema in the Chinese general population compared to the Dutch after adjusting for confounders, indicating that factors other than smoking, age and sex contribute to presence of CT-defined emphysema.