The impact of occupational exposures on infection rates during the COVID-19 pandemic:a test-negative design study with register data of 207 034 Dutch workers

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effects of occupational exposures on the risk of a positive COVID-19 test, and whether this differed across pandemic waves. METHODS: Data from 207 034 workers from The Netherlands with test data on COVID-19 from June 2020 until August 2021 were available. Occupational exposure was estimated by using the eight dimensions of a COVID-19 job exposure matrix (JEM). Personal characteristics, household composition and residence area were derived from Statistics Netherlands. A test-negative design was applied in which the risk of a positive test was analy... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Eekhout, Iris
van Tongeren, Martie
Pearce, Neil
Oude Hengel, Karen M
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2023
Reihe/Periodikum: Eekhout , I , van Tongeren , M , Pearce , N & Oude Hengel , K M 2023 , ' The impact of occupational exposures on infection rates during the COVID-19 pandemic : a test-negative design study with register data of 207 034 Dutch workers ' , Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health . https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.4086
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29021715
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://research.manchester.ac.uk/en/publications/b5055790-3e5b-4c4a-96e9-2b826793d6e9

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effects of occupational exposures on the risk of a positive COVID-19 test, and whether this differed across pandemic waves. METHODS: Data from 207 034 workers from The Netherlands with test data on COVID-19 from June 2020 until August 2021 were available. Occupational exposure was estimated by using the eight dimensions of a COVID-19 job exposure matrix (JEM). Personal characteristics, household composition and residence area were derived from Statistics Netherlands. A test-negative design was applied in which the risk of a positive test was analyzed in a conditional logit model. RESULTS: All eight dimensions of occupational exposure included in the JEM increased the odds of a positive test for the entire study period and three pandemic waves [OR ranging from 1.09, (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.17) to 1.77 (95% CI 1.61-1.96)]. Adjusting for a previous positive test and other covariates strongly reduced the odds to be infected, but most dimensions remained at elevated risk. Fully adjusted models showed that contaminated work spaces and face covering were mostly relevant in the first two pandemic waves, whereas income insecurity showed higher odds in the third wave. Several occupations have a higher predicted value for a positive COVID-19 test, with variation over time. Discussion Occupational exposures are associated with a higher risk of a positive test, but variations over time exist in occupations with the highest risks. These findings provide insights for interventions among workers for future pandemic waves of COVID-19 or other respiratory epidemics.