The Role of the General Practitioner in the Dutch System of Post-Mortem Investigations

Objective: General Practitioners (GPs) have an important role in the Dutch system of external post-mortem examination (E-PM). They perform at least 50% of the E-PMs. This research aims to study the competence of the GPs in the Netherlands in performing E-PMs. To achieve this, a survey was performed amongst GPs. The study analysed if GPs felt competent to perform E-PMs, if they had knowledge of and acted according to the Dutch Burial Act and if they were consistent in their acts and thoughts. Methods: An online survey conducted amongst GPs resulted in 225 datasets, after excluding 36 surveys fo... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Woudenberg - van den Broek, Cécile
Treurniet, Henriette
van der Velden, Koos
Duijst, Wilma
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2022
Reihe/Periodikum: Woudenberg - van den Broek , C , Treurniet , H , van der Velden , K & Duijst , W 2022 , ' The Role of the General Practitioner in the Dutch System of Post-Mortem Investigations ' , European Journal of General Practice , vol. 10 . https://doi.org/10.37421/2329-9126.2022.10.471
Schlagwörter: death / forensic medicine / external post-mortem examination / general practitioners / competence / consistency / legal knowledge
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-29021624
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/en/publications/f00d33f8-7ec3-44a9-b6b0-27af0289dcf8

Objective: General Practitioners (GPs) have an important role in the Dutch system of external post-mortem examination (E-PM). They perform at least 50% of the E-PMs. This research aims to study the competence of the GPs in the Netherlands in performing E-PMs. To achieve this, a survey was performed amongst GPs. The study analysed if GPs felt competent to perform E-PMs, if they had knowledge of and acted according to the Dutch Burial Act and if they were consistent in their acts and thoughts. Methods: An online survey conducted amongst GPs resulted in 225 datasets, after excluding 36 surveys for various reasons. Results: There was no significant difference in the feeling of competence between GPs (79.47%) and GP registrars (86.49%). Of all the respondents 40.89% were consistent in their acts and thoughts on the matter of E-PMs and 33.78% of respondents scored a 100% on legal knowledge? Of all the respondents that felt competent 47.28% showed inconsistency in acts and thoughts as well as lack of legal knowledge. Conclusion: Although every physician in the Netherlands is qualified to perform E-PMs, this research shows this does not automatically imply they are competent to do so. The inconsistency in acts and thoughts and/or the lack of legal knowledge in the matter of E-PMs undermines the current Dutch system of death investigations. Keywords: Death • Forensic medicine • External post-mortem examination • General practitioners • Competence • Consistency • Legal knowledge