Modality exclusivity norms for 336 properties and 411 concepts in Dutch: a replication of English [9 figures for download] ...
In this experiment ( N = 42), 336 properties and 411 concepts in Dutch were rated on the basis of three conceptual modalities—auditory, haptic (or tactile), and visual. Specifically, participants rated the extent to which they experienced certain words through the senses of hearing, touch and vision. The mean ratings bore high interrater reliability and interitem consistency. For each word, modality exclusivity—i.e., the overall perceptual strength—, and dominant modality—i.e., the highest rating—were also calculated. The stimuli as well as the analyses were in part based on previous norms for... Mehr ...
Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Dokumenttyp: | Figure |
Erscheinungsdatum: | 2016 |
Verlag/Hrsg.: |
figshare
|
Schlagwörter: | Language / 179999 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences not elsewhere classified / FOS: Psychology / Linguistics / FOS: Languages and literature / 200302 English Language / 200310 Other European Languages / 80103 Computer Graphics / FOS: Computer and information sciences / 170299 Cognitive Science not elsewhere classified / 170204 Linguistic Processes incl. Speech Production and Comprehension / 200322 Comparative Language Studies |
Sprache: | unknown |
Permalink: | https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-28983023 |
Datenquelle: | BASE; Originalkatalog |
Powered By: | BASE |
Link(s) : | https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3459632.v4 |
In this experiment ( N = 42), 336 properties and 411 concepts in Dutch were rated on the basis of three conceptual modalities—auditory, haptic (or tactile), and visual. Specifically, participants rated the extent to which they experienced certain words through the senses of hearing, touch and vision. The mean ratings bore high interrater reliability and interitem consistency. For each word, modality exclusivity—i.e., the overall perceptual strength—, and dominant modality—i.e., the highest rating—were also calculated. The stimuli as well as the analyses were in part based on previous norms for English, the results of which were closely replicated. First, dominantly visual words were by far the most numerous. Second, visual and haptic ratings were quite related, whereas the auditory modality came out as the most exclusive. Third, properties and concepts also presented a difference in exclusivity, with concepts showing greater multimodality. Fourth, the data presented sound-symbolism, that is, non-arbitrary ...