The Dynamic Relationship between the Intention and Final Decision for the COVID-19 Booster: A Study among Students and Staff at the University of Liège, Belgium

While many studies have documented the intentions for the COVID-19 vaccine booster, few have explored the change from intention to final decision. This study explores the COVID-19 booster intentions and the change from intention to decision in a primo-vaccinated university population, with a distinction between staff members and students. It looks at the sociodemographic and medical characteristics, health literacy, personal COVID-19 infection and vaccination history, and attitudes/intentions regarding the booster, among the 1030 participants (64.4% staff members, 61.3% female, median age 36.0... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Marine Paridans
Justine Monseur
Anne-Françoise Donneau
Nicolas Gillain
Eddy Husson
Dieudonné Leclercq
Christelle Meuris
Gilles Darcis
Michel Moutschen
Claude Saegerman
Laurent Gillet
Fabrice Bureau
Michèle Guillaume
Benoit Pétré
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2022
Reihe/Periodikum: Vaccines, Vol 10, Iss 1485, p 1485 (2022)
Verlag/Hrsg.: MDPI AG
Schlagwörter: COVID-19 / intention and final COVID-19 booster status / academic population / prevention / public health / Medicine / R
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-28972428
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10091485

While many studies have documented the intentions for the COVID-19 vaccine booster, few have explored the change from intention to final decision. This study explores the COVID-19 booster intentions and the change from intention to decision in a primo-vaccinated university population, with a distinction between staff members and students. It looks at the sociodemographic and medical characteristics, health literacy, personal COVID-19 infection and vaccination history, and attitudes/intentions regarding the booster, among the 1030 participants (64.4% staff members, 61.3% female, median age 36.0 years). Of the 8.7% who were initially hesitant, 72.7% ultimately got a booster and 27.3% did not. Another 84.2% intended to get a booster and 7.1% did not. Among the latter two groups, 88.9% maintained their intention and 11.1% changed their minds. The determinants associated with the intentions were health literacy and previous intentions regarding the COVID-19 primo-vaccination. The determinants associated with the change to non-vaccination were a previous COVID-19 infection, a past COVID-19 primo-vaccination intention, and a neutralizing antibody level. The results point to an opening for the support in decision-making, with a significant percentage of the study population potentially changing their mind between intention and final decision; this process should start early and be tailored to the individual’s COVID-19 history. A personalized approach seems necessary in order to ensure that individuals make an informed choice.