Burden of COVID-19 on primary care in Belgium: a prospective nationwide observational study from March to August 2020 ...

Abstract Background The COVID-19 outbreak had an important impact on general practice, for example the lack of personal protective equipment (PPE) and the switch to telephone consultations. We installed a monitoring instrument and reported the burden the COVID-19 pandemic placed on Belgian general practitioners (GPs) during the first wave of the pandemic. Methods We conducted an observational longitudinal prospective study from the 19th of March until the 17th of August 2020. Daily data were collected by using a structured electronic form integrated into the GPs’ electronic medical records (EM... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Vaes, Bert
Vos, Bénédicte
Foidart, Maxime
De Schreye, Robrecht
Schrans, Diego
Philips, Hilde
Aertgeerts, Bert
Doggen, Kris
Dokumenttyp: Datenquelle
Erscheinungsdatum: 2023
Verlag/Hrsg.: figshare
Schlagwörter: Medicine / Neuroscience / Biotechnology / Cancer / Inorganic Chemistry / FOS: Chemical sciences / 110309 Infectious Diseases / FOS: Health sciences
Sprache: unknown
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-28970929
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6584993

Abstract Background The COVID-19 outbreak had an important impact on general practice, for example the lack of personal protective equipment (PPE) and the switch to telephone consultations. We installed a monitoring instrument and reported the burden the COVID-19 pandemic placed on Belgian general practitioners (GPs) during the first wave of the pandemic. Methods We conducted an observational longitudinal prospective study from the 19th of March until the 17th of August 2020. Daily data were collected by using a structured electronic form integrated into the GPs’ electronic medical records (EMRs). Data were collected on the GPs’ need for support and workload, epidemiological indicators and the availability of PPE. Reports with graphical presentations were made for GP circles and primary care zones, and governments of different administrative levels had access to all data to guide their policy. Results A total of 3.769 different GP centres participated, which included more than 10.000 GPs. Throughout the ...