Universal Banking and the Development of Secondary Corporate Debt Markets: Lessons from 1830s Belgium
This paper proposes a reassessment of the old-age debate on universal banking and growth by putting it on a different plan. Modern financial economics are used to provide new theoretical foundations to Gerschenkron's (1962) hypothesis: universality is interpreted as a strategy for banks to reach the critical size needed in order to perform successful securitization of corporate debt. A relevant natural experiment in universal banking and industrialization (Belgium in the 1830s) illustrates the argument. The conclusion is that creating a new financial market also implies establishing intermedia... Mehr ...
Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Dokumenttyp: | doc-type:workingPaper |
Erscheinungsdatum: | 2010 |
Verlag/Hrsg.: |
Oslo: Norges Bank
|
Schlagwörter: | ddc:330 / G24 / G32 / N23 / O16 / universal banking / stock markets / intermediation / financial development |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Permalink: | https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-28963197 |
Datenquelle: | BASE; Originalkatalog |
Powered By: | BASE |
Link(s) : | http://hdl.handle.net/10419/209966 |
This paper proposes a reassessment of the old-age debate on universal banking and growth by putting it on a different plan. Modern financial economics are used to provide new theoretical foundations to Gerschenkron's (1962) hypothesis: universality is interpreted as a strategy for banks to reach the critical size needed in order to perform successful securitization of corporate debt. A relevant natural experiment in universal banking and industrialization (Belgium in the 1830s) illustrates the argument. The conclusion is that creating a new financial market also implies establishing intermediaries to supply crucial functions such as underwriting, certification, and liquidity provision.