The Duration of Judicial Deliberation: Evidence from Belgium

We utilize case-level data from a large Belgian court to study a policy-relevant but thus far empirically unexplored aspect of judicial behavior: the time that a judge takes to deliberate on a case before rendering a verdict. Exploiting the de facto random administrative assignment of filed cases among the serving judges and using survival analysis methods, we find that the duration of judicial deliberation varies not only with measures of case complexity, but also with judge and disputing party characteristics. We further find evidence consistent with the hypothesis that longer judicial delib... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Bielen, Samantha
Marneffe, Wim
Grajzl, Peter
Dimitrova-Grajzl, Valentina
Dokumenttyp: doc-type:workingPaper
Erscheinungsdatum: 2016
Verlag/Hrsg.: Munich: Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo)
Schlagwörter: ddc:330 / K40 / K41 / K49 / judicial deliberation / case-level data / survival analysis / speed-quality tradeoff / Belgium
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-28963158
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : http://hdl.handle.net/10419/144982

We utilize case-level data from a large Belgian court to study a policy-relevant but thus far empirically unexplored aspect of judicial behavior: the time that a judge takes to deliberate on a case before rendering a verdict. Exploiting the de facto random administrative assignment of filed cases among the serving judges and using survival analysis methods, we find that the duration of judicial deliberation varies not only with measures of case complexity, but also with judge and disputing party characteristics. We further find evidence consistent with the hypothesis that longer judicial deliberation improves the quality of judicial decisions.